Compare Motorola Moto Z 64GB vs HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:50:58, Updated date: 2021-10-20 19:04:05
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1."Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", performance comparison
"Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" has a width of 75.3mm, a length of 153.3mm, and a thickness of 5.2mm. Also, the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" has a width of 77.3mm, a length of 153.6mm, and a thickness of 8.1mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB". For that reason, the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB". For that reason, we recommend the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto Z 64GB | 67/100 | 75.3mm x 153.3mm x 5.2mm |
HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB | 58/100 | 77.3mm x 153.6mm x 8.1mm |
"Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" is about 136.0g, and the weight of the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" is about 174.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", and there is a difference of about 38g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" is superior to the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" over the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto Z 64GB | 75/100 | 136.0g |
HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB | 60/100 | 174.0g |
"Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto Z 64GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
"Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" is 1440 x 2560, and pixel density is 534ppi. Also, the resolution on the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" is 1440 x 2560, and pixel density is 534ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto Z 64GB | 88/100 | 534ppi |
HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB | 88/100 | 534ppi |
"Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" is 2600.0mAh, and the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" is 3200.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB", with a 600mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" is recommended over the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto Z 64GB | 59/100 | 2600.0mAh |
HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB | 68/100 | 3200.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Motorola Moto Z 64GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820, with performance measured at 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810, with performance measured at 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" over the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto Z 64GB | 57/100 | 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB | 73/100 | 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" is 4.0GB and the weight of the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" is superior to the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" over the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto Z 64GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
"Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" is 64.0GB. Also the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto Z 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
"Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Motorola Moto Z 64GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto Z 64GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB | 68/100 | 16.0MP |
"Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Motorola Moto Z 64GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Motorola Moto Z 64GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Motorola Moto Z 64GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"Motorola Moto Z 64GB" and "HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Motorola Moto Z 64GB | HTC 10 evo (2016) 64GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Motorola | HTC |
Release date | 2016-09 | 2016-11 |
Color | Black+Gray/Black+Rose Gold/Black+Gold/White | Silver/Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.3mm x 153.3mm x 5.2mm | 77.3mm x 153.6mm x 8.1mm |
Weight | 136.0g | 174.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | AMOLED | Super LCD3 |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1440 x 2560 | 1440 x 2560 |
Pixel density | 534ppi | 534ppi |
Battery capacity | 2600.0mAh | 3200.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 | Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 |
CPU specs | 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |