Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB vs. Celkon A35k Remote 512MB Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:38:03, Updated date: 2021-10-20 17:29:22
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Contents
- 1."Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", performance comparison
"Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" has a width of 62.8mm, a length of 111.5mm, and a thickness of 10.7mm. Also, the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" has a width of 63.0mm, a length of 119.0mm, and a thickness of 10.7mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" is a more compact size than the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB". For that reason the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB | 79/100 | 62.8mm x 111.5mm x 10.7mm |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 79/100 | 63.0mm x 119.0mm x 10.7mm |
"Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" is about 74.0g, and the weight of the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" is about 102.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", with a difference of about 28g. For that reason the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" over the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB | 96/100 | 74.0g |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 89/100 | 102.0g |
"Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" has a 3.5inch display. Also, the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" has a 3.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB | 50/100 | 3.5inch |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 50/100 | 3.5inch |
"Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" is 320 x 480, and pixel density is 164ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" is 320 x 480, and pixel density is 164ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB | 11/100 | 164ppi |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 11/100 | 164ppi |
"Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" is 1300.0mAh, and the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" is 1400.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB | 29/100 | 1300.0mAh |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 32/100 | 1400.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6572M, with performance measured at 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB | 4/100 | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 0/100 | 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores) |
"Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" is 512.0MB and the weight of the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" is 256.0MB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB | 5/100 | 512.0MB |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 0/100 | 256.0MB |
"Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" is 4.0GB. Also the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" is 512.0MB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", with a roughly 508GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" is superior to the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" over the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB | 11/100 | 4.0GB |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 0/100 | 512.0MB |
"Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" has a 2.0MP main camera. Also, "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" has a 15.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB", with a roughly 13MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" is superior to the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" over the "Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB | 5/100 | 2.0MP |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 66/100 | 15.0MP |
"Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB | 27/100 | 3.0MP |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | - /100 |
"Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 4GB | Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Yezz | Celkon |
Release date | 2015-11 | 2015-06 |
Color | Black/Red/Silver/White/Blue/Gold | White/Black/Blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 62.8mm x 111.5mm x 10.7mm | 63.0mm x 119.0mm x 10.7mm |
Weight | 74.0g | 102.0g |
Display size | 3.5inch | 3.5inch |
Display type | TFT | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 320 x 480 | 320 x 480 |
Pixel density | 164ppi | 164ppi |
Battery capacity | 1300.0mAh | 1400.0mAh |
CPU specs | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 256.0MB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 512.0MB |
Rear-camera resolution | 2.0MP | 15.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |