Which is better, ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB or vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB? We compared their features and specs in detail
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:15:04, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:25:17
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1."ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", performance comparison
"ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" has a width of 75.0mm, a length of 151.7mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm. Also, the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" has a width of 73.6mm, a length of 153.8mm, and a thickness of 8.4mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB | 62/100 | 75.0mm x 151.7mm x 7.9mm |
vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB | 64/100 | 73.6mm x 153.8mm x 8.4mm |
"ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" is about 170.0g, and the weight of the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" is about 178.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB | 62/100 | 170.0g |
vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB | 59/100 | 178.0g |
"ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" has a 5.46inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB | 81/100 | 5.46inch |
"ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" is 1440 x 2560, and pixel density is 534ppi. Also, the resolution on the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" is 1440 x 2560, and pixel density is 537ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB | 88/100 | 534ppi |
vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB | 88/100 | 537ppi |
"ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" is 3400.0mAh, and the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" is 4080.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" has greater battery capacity than the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB", with a 680mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" is recommended over the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB | 71/100 | 3400.0mAh |
vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB | 80/100 | 4080.0mAh |
"ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821, with performance measured at 2.35GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820, with performance measured at 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB | 67/100 | 2.35GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB | 65/100 | 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" is 6.0GB and the weight of the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" is 6.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB | 90/100 | 6.0GB |
vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB | 90/100 | 6.0GB |
"ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" is 128.0GB. Also the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" is 128.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB | 90/100 | 128.0GB |
vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB | 90/100 | 128.0GB |
"ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" has a 20.0MP main camera. Also, "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" has a 12.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", with a roughly 8MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" is superior to the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" over the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB | 78/100 | 20.0MP |
vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB | 59/100 | 12.0MP |
"ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" has an 16.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB", with a roughly 8MP difference. As a result, the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" is more suited than the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB" over the "ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB | 75/100 | 16.0MP |
"ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB" and "vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
ZTE Axon 7s (2017) 128GB | vivo Xplay6 (2016) 128GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | ZTE | vivo |
Release date | 2017-06 | 2016-12 |
Color | Gold | Gold/Rose Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.0mm x 151.7mm x 7.9mm | 73.6mm x 153.8mm x 8.4mm |
Weight | 170.0g | 178.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.46inch |
Display type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1440 x 2560 | 1440 x 2560 |
Pixel density | 534ppi | 537ppi |
Battery capacity | 3400.0mAh | 4080.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 |
CPU specs | 2.35GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 6.0GB | 6.0GB |
Storage size | 128.0GB | 128.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 20.0MP | 12.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 16.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |