BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB vs alcatel Pop Astro 4GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:42:24, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:02:07
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | alcatel Pop Astro 4GB | |||
General rating: | 34.4/100 (The 2877th of all smartphones) | 37.6/100 (The 1797th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 61/100 | 76/100 | ||
Weight | 69/100 | 72/100 | ||
Screen size | 74/100 | 66/100 | ||
Display quality | 25/100 | 47/100 | ||
Battery life | 50/100 | 50/100 | ||
Processing power | 16/100 | 19/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 5/100 | 20/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 11/100 | 11/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 27/100 | 27/100 | ||
Front camera performance | - /100 | - /100 | ||
Contents
- 1."BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", performance comparison
"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a width of 73.8mm, a length of 143.0mm, and a thickness of 9.8mm. Also, the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" has a width of 65.3mm, a length of 133.6mm, and a thickness of 9.9mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". The "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" excels over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" is a more compact size than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". For that reason the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" is a considerably larger size than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" is superior to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 61/100 | 73.8mm x 143.0mm x 9.8mm |
alcatel Pop Astro 4GB | 76/100 | 65.3mm x 133.6mm x 9.9mm |
"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is about 151.0g, and the weight of the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" is about 144.9g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 69/100 | 151.0g |
alcatel Pop Astro 4GB | 72/100 | 144.9g |
"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" has a 4.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a larger screen compared to the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", with a roughly 0.5inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" than on the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
alcatel Pop Astro 4GB | 66/100 | 4.5inch |
"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 480 x 854, and pixel density is 195ppi. Also, the resolution on the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" is 540 x 960, and pixel density is 244ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" has much higher pixel density than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a difference of roughly 49ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" is superior to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 25/100 | 195ppi |
alcatel Pop Astro 4GB | 47/100 | 244ppi |
"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 2000.0mAh, and the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" is 2000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 50/100 | 2000.0mAh |
alcatel Pop Astro 4GB | 50/100 | 2000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6580, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6732, with performance measured at 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 16/100 | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
alcatel Pop Astro 4GB | 19/100 | 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 512.0MB and the weight of the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" is 1.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a difference of about 511GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" is superior to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 5/100 | 512.0MB |
alcatel Pop Astro 4GB | 20/100 | 1.0GB |
"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 4.0GB. Also the "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" is 4.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 11/100 | 4.0GB |
alcatel Pop Astro 4GB | 11/100 | 4.0GB |
"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a 5.0MP main camera. Also, "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" has a 5.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 27/100 | 5.0MP |
alcatel Pop Astro 4GB | 27/100 | 5.0MP |
"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | - /100 | |
alcatel Pop Astro 4GB | - /100 |
"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "alcatel Pop Astro 4GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | alcatel Pop Astro 4GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | BLU | alcatel |
Release date | 2016-05 | 2015-04 |
Color | Black/White/Gold | White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.8mm x 143.0mm x 9.8mm | 65.3mm x 133.6mm x 9.9mm |
Weight | 151.0g | 144.9g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 4.5inch |
Display type | LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 854 | 540 x 960 |
Pixel density | 195ppi | 244ppi |
Battery capacity | 2000.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6580 | Mediatek MT6732 |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |