Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB vs Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:41:54, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:02:14
How did the evaluations between the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
Contents
- 1."Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", performance comparison
"Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has a width of 68.5mm, a length of 138.0mm, and a thickness of 10.0mm. Also, the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" has a width of 72.7mm, a length of 145.6mm, and a thickness of 10.0mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the main unit, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB". Therefore, it is easier to grip and hold the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" than the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB". For this reason, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is recommended.
There is no real difference in length or width between the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", so they are both about the same in terms of usability, ease of carry, and bulkiness. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Comparing the overall size of the main unit, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is smaller than the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB". As a result, it is easier to use the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" with one hand compared to the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", and its size makes it more comfortable to carry around. For this reason, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is recommended.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 70/100 | 68.5mm x 138.0mm x 10.0mm |
Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB | 63/100 | 72.7mm x 145.6mm x 10.0mm |
"Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is about 78.2g, and the weight of the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" is about 167.0g. If you compare the weight of the two, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is a considerably lighter smartphone than the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", with a difference of about 88.8g. Because of this, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" puts less of a burden on the fingers and wrists than the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB". If you want a smartphone that won't tire your hands out even when using it for a long time, we recommend that you buy the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" rather than the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 96/100 | 78.2g |
Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB | 63/100 | 167.0g |
"Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has a 4.5inch display. Also, the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the size of the display and screen, the screen size of the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" is larger than that of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", with a difference of approximately 0.5inch. As a result, there will be unintended touches on the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" compared to the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and it is possible to enjoy games and videos on a large screen. For this reason, the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" is recommended.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 66/100 | 4.5inch |
Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
"Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is 854 x 960, and pixel density is 285ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" is 480 x 854, and pixel density is 195ppi. Comparing the screen definition, the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has a much higher pixel density than the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", with a difference of about 90ppi. The screen on the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is clear and crisp, and puts less strain on the eyes than that of the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB". If you want to choose a smartphone that is gentle on your eyes with a display that shows text and images clearly, we recommend that you buy the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" rather than the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 57/100 | 285ppi |
Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB | 25/100 | 195ppi |
"Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is 2000.0mAh, and the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" is 3000.0mAh. With regards to battery performance, the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" has a substantially larger battery capacity than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", with a difference of 1000mAh. The "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" can be used without charging for a longer time than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", so it can be used when out and about. If you want a smartphone with a longer-lasting battery, we recommend that you buy the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" rather than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 50/100 | 2000.0mAh |
Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB | 65/100 | 3000.0mAh |
"Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
Also, the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6582M, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" has significantly higher specs than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB". The "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" proves to be more advanced than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" in the way that apps run quickly and games play smoothly. If you're looking for a high-spec smartphone that runs quickly and plays games smoothly, we recommend that you buy the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" rather than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 6/100 | 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB | 16/100 | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is 512.0MB and the weight of the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" is 1.0GB. As for memory performance, the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" has a larger memory capacity than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", with a difference of about 511GB. The "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" has better multitasking, less crashing, and runs 3D games and VR video better than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB". If you're looking for a smartphone that will remain stable even when you are using multiple apps at the same time, and which will allow you to play 3D games and VR video comfortably, we recommend that you buy the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" rather than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 5/100 | 512.0MB |
Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB | 20/100 | 1.0GB |
"Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" is 4.0GB. Also the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" is 4.0GB. There is no real difference between the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB"and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" 's ROMs and storage capacities, so both can store roughly the same amount of photographs and apps. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 11/100 | 4.0GB |
Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB | 11/100 | 4.0GB |
"Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has a 5.0MP main camera. Also, "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. The rear-facing camera of the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" also has a higher pixel count than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB", with a difference of about 3MP. The "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" is more capable than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" of taking high-definition photos and videos, and produces better results when printing out the photos you have taken. If you want a smartphone that is designed for video and photography, we recommend buying the "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" rather than the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 27/100 | 5.0MP |
Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB | 50/100 | 8.0MP |
"Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" has an 3.0MP front camera and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB" has an 3.0MP front camera. There is little difference between the camera capabilities and the pixel density of the "Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB"'s front facing cameras, so the quality of photographs and video footage is virtually the same. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | 27/100 | 3.0MP |
Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB | 27/100 | 3.0MP |
"Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB" and "Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Celkon A125 (2014) 4GB | Celkon Q3000 (2014) 4GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Celkon | Celkon |
Color | White/Black | White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 68.5mm x 138.0mm x 10.0mm | 72.7mm x 145.6mm x 10.0mm |
Weight | 78.2g | 167.0g |
Display size | 4.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | TFT | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 854 x 960 | 480 x 854 |
Pixel density | 285ppi | 195ppi |
Battery capacity | 2000.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 3.0MP | 3.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |