Compare Honor V8 (2016) 64GB vs alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:43:08, Updated date: 2020-04-16 19:53:34
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Honor V8 (2016) 64GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | |||
General rating: | 64.9/100 (The 2081th of all smartphones) | 26.8/100 (The 1992th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 58/100 | 78/100 | ||
Weight | 62/100 | 91/100 | ||
Screen size | 85/100 | 50/100 | ||
Display quality | 81/100 | 11/100 | ||
Battery life | 72/100 | 29/100 | ||
Processing power | 88/100 | 4/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 70/100 | 0/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 67/100 | 0/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 59/100 | 5/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 58/100 | - /100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", performance comparison
"Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" has a width of 77.6mm, a length of 157.0mm, and a thickness of 7.8mm. Also, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has a width of 62.0mm, a length of 112.2mm, and a thickness of 11.9mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB". The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" excels over the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" over the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB". The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" excels over the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" over the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is a considerably larger size than the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is superior to the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" over the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Honor V8 (2016) 64GB | 58/100 | 77.6mm x 157.0mm x 7.8mm |
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | 78/100 | 62.0mm x 112.2mm x 11.9mm |
"Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" is about 170.0g, and the weight of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is about 98.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB", and there is a difference of about 72g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is superior to the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" over the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Honor V8 (2016) 64GB | 62/100 | 170.0g |
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | 91/100 | 98.0g |
"Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" has a 5.7inch display. Also, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has a 3.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a difference of approximately 2.2inch. The "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Honor V8 (2016) 64GB | 85/100 | 5.7inch |
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | 50/100 | 3.5inch |
"Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 386ppi. Also, the resolution on the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is 320 x 480, and pixel density is 164ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" has much higher pixel density than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a difference of roughly 222ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Honor V8 (2016) 64GB | 81/100 | 386ppi |
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | 11/100 | 164ppi |
"Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" is 3500.0mAh, and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is 1300.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" has greater battery capacity than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a 2200mAh difference. Since the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Honor V8 (2016) 64GB | 72/100 | 3500.0mAh |
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | 29/100 | 1300.0mAh |
"Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB"'s CPU is a HiSilicon Kirin 950 ,HiSilicon Kirin 955, with performance measured at 2.3GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6572M, with performance measured at 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Honor V8 (2016) 64GB | 88/100 | 2.3GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | 4/100 | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
"Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" is 4.0GB and the weight of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is 256.0MB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a difference of about 252GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Honor V8 (2016) 64GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | 0/100 | 256.0MB |
"Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" is 64.0GB. Also the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is 512.0MB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a roughly 448GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Honor V8 (2016) 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | 0/100 | 512.0MB |
"Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" has a 12.0MP main camera. Also, "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has a 2.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a roughly 10MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Honor V8 (2016) 64GB | 59/100 | 12.0MP |
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | 5/100 | 2.0MP |
"Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Honor V8 (2016) 64GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | - /100 |
"Honor V8 (2016) 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Honor V8 (2016) 64GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Honor | alcatel |
Release date | 2016-05 | 2015-05 |
Color | Silver/Gold/Rose Gold | Black |
OS | Android | Firefox |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 77.6mm x 157.0mm x 7.8mm | 62.0mm x 112.2mm x 11.9mm |
Weight | 170.0g | 98.0g |
Display size | 5.7inch | 3.5inch |
Display type | IPS-NEO LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 320 x 480 |
Pixel density | 386ppi | 164ppi |
Battery capacity | 3500.0mAh | 1300.0mAh |
Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 950 ,HiSilicon Kirin 955 | Mediatek MT6572M |
CPU specs | 2.3GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 256.0MB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 512.0MB |
Rear-camera resolution | 12.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |