Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Should you buy Lava Iris 503e or alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:36:22, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:46:48

Lava Iris 503ealcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
Lava Iris 503ealcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Lava Iris 503e" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

Lava Iris 503ealcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
Lava Iris 503ealcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.1
61/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Weightrating-image3.0
60/100
rating-image4.6
91/100
Screen sizerating-image3.7
74/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Display qualityrating-image1.3
25/100
rating-image1
11/100
Battery liferating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image1.5
29/100
Processing powerrating-image1
4/100
rating-image1
4/100
Memory capacityrating-image1
5/100
rating-image1
0/100
Storage capacityrating-image1
11/100
rating-image1
0/100
Rear camera performancerating-image1
13/100
rating-image1
5/100
Front camera performancerating-image1
7/100
rating-image
- /100

"Lava Iris 503e" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", performance comparison

"Lava Iris 503e" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Lava Iris 503e" has a width of 73.3mm, a length of 143.2mm, and a thickness of 10.5mm. Also, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has a width of 62.0mm, a length of 112.2mm, and a thickness of 11.9mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Lava Iris 503e". The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" excels over the "Lava Iris 503e" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" over the "Lava Iris 503e".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Lava Iris 503e". The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" excels over the "Lava Iris 503e" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" over the "Lava Iris 503e".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is a considerably larger size than the "Lava Iris 503e". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is superior to the "Lava Iris 503e". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" over the "Lava Iris 503e".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Lava Iris 503e61/10073.3mm x 143.2mm x 10.5mm
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB78/10062.0mm x 112.2mm x 11.9mm

"Lava Iris 503e" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Lava Iris 503e" is about 175.0g, and the weight of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is about 98.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Lava Iris 503e", and there is a difference of about 77g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is superior to the "Lava Iris 503e". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" over the "Lava Iris 503e".

ScoreWeight
Lava Iris 503e60/100175.0g
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB91/10098.0g

"Lava Iris 503e" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Lava Iris 503e" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has a 3.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Lava Iris 503e" has a considerably larger screen than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a difference of approximately 1.5inch. The "Lava Iris 503e" is superior to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Lava Iris 503e" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Lava Iris 503e" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".

ScoreDisplay size
Lava Iris 503e74/1005.0inch
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB50/1003.5inch

"Lava Iris 503e" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Lava Iris 503e" is 480 x 854, and pixel density is 195ppi. Also, the resolution on the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is 320 x 480, and pixel density is 164ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Lava Iris 503e" has much higher pixel density than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a difference of roughly 31ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Lava Iris 503e" is superior to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Lava Iris 503e" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".

ScorePixel density
Lava Iris 503e25/100195ppi
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB11/100164ppi

"Lava Iris 503e" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Lava Iris 503e" is 2000.0mAh, and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is 1300.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Lava Iris 503e" has greater battery capacity than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a 700mAh difference. Since the "Lava Iris 503e" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Lava Iris 503e" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Lava Iris 503e50/1002000.0mAh
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB29/1001300.0mAh

"Lava Iris 503e" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

Also, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6572M, with performance measured at 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "Lava Iris 503e" and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreCPU specs
Lava Iris 503e4/1001.0GHz×2(2.0-cores)
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB4/1001.0GHz×2(2.0-cores)

"Lava Iris 503e" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Lava Iris 503e" is 512.0MB and the weight of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is 256.0MB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Lava Iris 503e" and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
Lava Iris 503e5/100512.0MB
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB0/100256.0MB

"Lava Iris 503e" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Lava Iris 503e" is 4.0GB. Also the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is 512.0MB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Lava Iris 503e" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a roughly 508GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Lava Iris 503e" is superior to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Lava Iris 503e" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".

ScoreStorage size
Lava Iris 503e11/1004.0GB
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB0/100512.0MB

"Lava Iris 503e" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Lava Iris 503e" has a 3.15MP main camera. Also, "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has a 2.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Lava Iris 503e" has a higher pixel count than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a roughly 1.15MP difference. As a result, the "Lava Iris 503e" is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Lava Iris 503e".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Lava Iris 503e13/1003.15MP
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB5/1002.0MP

"Lava Iris 503e" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Lava Iris 503e7/1001.3MP
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB - /100

"Lava Iris 503e" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Lava Iris 503ealcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
ImageLava Iris 503ealcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
MakerLavaalcatel
Release date2013-102015-05
ColorblackBlack
OSAndroidFirefox
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)73.3mm x 143.2mm x 10.5mm62.0mm x 112.2mm x 11.9mm
Weight175.0g98.0g
Display size5.0inch3.5inch
Display typeTFTTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 854320 x 480
Pixel density195ppi164ppi
Battery capacity2000.0mAh1300.0mAh
CPU specs1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores)1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores)
RAM size512.0MB256.0MB
Storage size4.0GB512.0MB
Rear-camera resolution3.15MP2.0MP

Check price

Articles related to Lava Iris 503e
Articles related to alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB

Lava Iris 503e

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Lava Iris 503e

Articles related to Lava Iris 503e
Articles related to alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB

alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB

New articles