Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB vs alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:03:55, Updated date: 2021-10-20 17:37:38

Galaxy Xcover 3 8GBalcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
Galaxy Xcover 3 8GBalcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

Galaxy Xcover 3 8GBalcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB

alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.4
70.1mm x 132.9mm x 10.0mm
rating-image3.9
62.0mm x 112.2mm x 11.9mm
Weightrating-image3.4
154.0g
rating-image4.6
98.0g
Screen sizerating-image3.3
4.5inch
rating-image2.5
3.5inch
Display qualityrating-image1.5
207ppi
rating-image1
164ppi
Battery liferating-image2.7
2200.0mAh
rating-image1.5
1300.0mAh
Processing powerrating-image1.1
1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
rating-image1
1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image1.8
1.5GB
rating-image1
256.0MB
Storage capacityrating-image1.2
8.0GB
rating-image1
512.0MB
Rear camera performancerating-image1.4
5.0MP
rating-image1
2.0MP
Front camera performancerating-image1
2.0MP
rating-image

"Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", performance comparison

"Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" has a width of 70.1mm, a length of 132.9mm, and a thickness of 10.0mm. Also, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has a width of 62.0mm, a length of 112.2mm, and a thickness of 11.9mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB". The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" excels over the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" over the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB". The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" excels over the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" over the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is a considerably larger size than the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is superior to the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" over the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB67/10070.1mm x 132.9mm x 10.0mm
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB78/10062.0mm x 112.2mm x 11.9mm

"Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" is about 154.0g, and the weight of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is about 98.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB", and there is a difference of about 56g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is superior to the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" over the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB".

ScoreWeight
Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB68/100154.0g
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB91/10098.0g

"Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" has a 4.5inch display. Also, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has a 3.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a difference of approximately 1inch. The "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" is superior to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".

ScoreDisplay size
Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB66/1004.5inch
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB50/1003.5inch

"Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" is 480 x 800, and pixel density is 207ppi. Also, the resolution on the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is 320 x 480, and pixel density is 164ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" has much higher pixel density than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a difference of roughly 43ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" is superior to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".

ScorePixel density
Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB30/100207ppi
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB11/100164ppi

"Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" is 2200.0mAh, and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is 1300.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" has greater battery capacity than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a 900mAh difference. Since the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB53/1002200.0mAh
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB29/1001300.0mAh

"Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB"'s CPU is a Marvell Armada PXA1908, with performance measured at 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6572M, with performance measured at 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" has considerably higher specs than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" is superior to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".

ScoreCPU specs
Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB21/1001.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB4/1001.0GHz×2(2.0-cores)

"Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" is 1.5GB and the weight of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is 256.0MB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a difference of about 254.5GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" is superior to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".

ScoreRAM size
Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB35/1001.5GB
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB0/100256.0MB

"Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" is 8.0GB. Also the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" is 512.0MB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a roughly 504GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" is superior to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".

ScoreStorage size
Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB24/1008.0GB
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB0/100512.0MB

"Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" has a 5.0MP main camera. Also, "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB" has a 2.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", with a roughly 3MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" is superior to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB27/1005.0MP
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB5/1002.0MP

"Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB15/1002.0MP
alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB - /100

"Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Galaxy Xcover 3 8GBalcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
ImageGalaxy Xcover 3 8GBalcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB
MakerSamsungalcatel
Release date2015-042015-05
ColorGrayBlack
OSAndroidFirefox
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)70.1mm x 132.9mm x 10.0mm62.0mm x 112.2mm x 11.9mm
Weight154.0g98.0g
Display size4.5inch3.5inch
Display typePLS IPSTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 800320 x 480
Pixel density207ppi164ppi
Battery capacity2200.0mAh1300.0mAh
ChipsetMarvell Armada PXA1908Mediatek MT6572M
CPU specs1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores)
RAM size1.5GB256.0MB
Storage size8.0GB512.0MB
Rear-camera resolution5.0MP2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB
Articles related to alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB

Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB

Articles related to Galaxy Xcover 3 8GB
Articles related to alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB

alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) Firefox 512MB

New articles