Which is better, Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB or BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB? We compared their features and specs in detail
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:17:22, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:54:16
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1."Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", performance comparison
"Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" has a width of 72.5mm, a length of 142.0mm, and a thickness of 8.1mm. Also, the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a width of 73.8mm, a length of 143.0mm, and a thickness of 9.8mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". For that reason, the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". For that reason, we recommend the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB | 66/100 | 72.5mm x 142.0mm x 8.1mm |
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 61/100 | 73.8mm x 143.0mm x 9.8mm |
"Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" is about 145.0g, and the weight of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is about 151.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB | 72/100 | 145.0g |
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 69/100 | 151.0g |
"Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" has a 5.1inch display. Also, the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB | 75/100 | 5.1inch |
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
"Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 431ppi. Also, the resolution on the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 480 x 854, and pixel density is 195ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" has much higher pixel density than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a difference of roughly 236ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" is superior to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB | 85/100 | 431ppi |
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 25/100 | 195ppi |
"Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" is 2800.0mAh, and the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 2000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a 800mAh difference. Since the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB | 62/100 | 2800.0mAh |
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 50/100 | 2000.0mAh |
"Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm APQ8084 Snapdragon 805, with performance measured at 2.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6580, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" has considerably higher specs than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" is superior to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB | 56/100 | 2.5GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 16/100 | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 512.0MB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a difference of about 510GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" is superior to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 5/100 | 512.0MB |
"Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 4.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a roughly 28GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" is superior to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 11/100 | 4.0GB |
"Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Also, "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a 5.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a roughly 11MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" is superior to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB | 68/100 | 16.0MP |
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | 27/100 | 5.0MP |
"Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB | 15/100 | 2.0MP |
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | - /100 |
"Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Galaxy S5 LTE-A G901F 32GB | BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Samsung | BLU |
Release date | 2014-08 | 2016-05 |
Color | Charcoal Black/Shimmering White/Electric Blue/Copper Gold | Black/White/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.5mm x 142.0mm x 8.1mm | 73.8mm x 143.0mm x 9.8mm |
Weight | 145.0g | 151.0g |
Display size | 5.1inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 480 x 854 |
Pixel density | 431ppi | 195ppi |
Battery capacity | 2800.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm APQ8084 Snapdragon 805 | Mediatek MT6580 |
CPU specs | 2.5GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 512.0MB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |