Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB vs GRAND M SIL-38: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2018-09-30 21:53:55, Updated date: 2020-04-16 19:58:13

vivo Xshot (2014) 32GBGRAND M SIL-38
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GBGRAND M SIL-38

Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "GRAND M SIL-38". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "GRAND M SIL-38" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.

vivo Xshot (2014) 32GBGRAND M SIL-38
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

GRAND M SIL-38
General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.3
73.3mm x 146.5mm x 8.0mm
rating-image3.2
73.0mm x 145.0mm x 9.4mm
Weightrating-image3.6
148.0g
rating-image3.1
171.0g
Screen sizerating-image3.9
5.2inch
rating-image3.7
5.0inch
Display qualityrating-image4.3
423ppi
rating-image1.3
195ppi
Battery liferating-image3.0
2600.0mAh
rating-image2.7
2200.0mAh
Processing powerrating-image3.2
2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
rating-image1
1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image3.0
3.0GB
rating-image1
512.0MB
Storage capacityrating-image2.8
32.0GB
rating-image1.2
8.0GB
Rear camera performancerating-image3.1
13.0MP
rating-image1.4
5.0MP
Front camera performancerating-image2.9
8.0MP
rating-image1.5
3.2MP

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "GRAND M SIL-38", performance comparison

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "GRAND M SIL-38" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a width of 73.3mm, a length of 146.5mm, and a thickness of 8.0mm. Also, the "GRAND M SIL-38" has a width of 73.0mm, a length of 145.0mm, and a thickness of 9.4mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "GRAND M SIL-38" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "GRAND M SIL-38". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "GRAND M SIL-38". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB65/10073.3mm x 146.5mm x 8.0mm
GRAND M SIL-3863/10073.0mm x 145.0mm x 9.4mm

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "GRAND M SIL-38", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is about 148.0g, and the weight of the "GRAND M SIL-38" is about 171.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "GRAND M SIL-38", with a difference of about 23g. For that reason the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "GRAND M SIL-38"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" over the "GRAND M SIL-38".

ScoreWeight
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB71/100148.0g
GRAND M SIL-3861/100171.0g

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "GRAND M SIL-38", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a 5.2inch display. Also, the "GRAND M SIL-38" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "GRAND M SIL-38". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB77/1005.2inch
GRAND M SIL-3874/1005.0inch

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "GRAND M SIL-38", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 423ppi. Also, the resolution on the "GRAND M SIL-38" is 480 x 854, and pixel density is 195ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has much higher pixel density than the "GRAND M SIL-38", with a difference of roughly 228ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is superior to the "GRAND M SIL-38". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" over the "GRAND M SIL-38".

ScorePixel density
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB85/100423ppi
GRAND M SIL-3825/100195ppi

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "GRAND M SIL-38", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is 2600.0mAh, and the "GRAND M SIL-38" is 2200.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "GRAND M SIL-38", with a 400mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is recommended over the "GRAND M SIL-38".

ScoreBattery capacity
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB59/1002600.0mAh
GRAND M SIL-3853/1002200.0mAh

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "GRAND M SIL-38", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8974AA Snapdragon 801, with performance measured at 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "GRAND M SIL-38"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6580, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has considerably higher specs than the "GRAND M SIL-38". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is superior to the "GRAND M SIL-38". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" over the "GRAND M SIL-38".

ScoreCPU specs
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB64/1002.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
GRAND M SIL-3816/1001.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "GRAND M SIL-38", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "GRAND M SIL-38" is 512.0MB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "GRAND M SIL-38", with a difference of about 509GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is superior to the "GRAND M SIL-38". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" over the "GRAND M SIL-38".

ScoreRAM size
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB60/1003.0GB
GRAND M SIL-385/100512.0MB

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "GRAND M SIL-38", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "GRAND M SIL-38" is 8.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "GRAND M SIL-38", with a roughly 24GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is superior to the "GRAND M SIL-38". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" over the "GRAND M SIL-38".

ScoreStorage size
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB55/10032.0GB
GRAND M SIL-3824/1008.0GB

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "GRAND M SIL-38" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "GRAND M SIL-38" has a 5.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "GRAND M SIL-38", with a roughly 8MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is superior to the "GRAND M SIL-38". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" over the "GRAND M SIL-38".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB61/10013.0MP
GRAND M SIL-3827/1005.0MP

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "GRAND M SIL-38", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "GRAND M SIL-38" has an 3.2MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "GRAND M SIL-38", with a roughly 4.8MP difference. As a result, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is more suited than the "GRAND M SIL-38" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" over the "GRAND M SIL-38".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB58/1008.0MP
GRAND M SIL-3829/1003.2MP

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "GRAND M SIL-38", performance comparison by specification sheet

vivo Xshot (2014) 32GBGRAND M SIL-38
Imagevivo Xshot (2014) 32GBGRAND M SIL-38
MakervivoBLU Products
ColorWhite+BlackBlack/Silver
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)73.3mm x 146.5mm x 8.0mm73.0mm x 145.0mm x 9.4mm
Weight148.0g171.0g
Display size5.2inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 1920480 x 854
Pixel density423ppi195ppi
Battery capacity2600.0mAh2200.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8974AA Snapdragon 801Mediatek MT6580
CPU specs2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB512.0MB
Storage size32.0GB8.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP5.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP3.2MP

Check price

Articles related to vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB
Articles related to GRAND M SIL-38

vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

Articles related to vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB
Articles related to GRAND M SIL-38

GRAND M SIL-38

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as GRAND M SIL-38

New articles