ZTE Axon mini 32GB vs. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:03:46, Updated date: 2021-10-20 18:15:19
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1.Compare Performance and Usability
- 1-0.Which one is easier to hold, "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"? Compare weight
- 1-2.Size comparison of "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Which one would you choose?
- 1-3.Compare the rear cameras of "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Which one has better picture quality?
- 1-4.Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"?
- 1-5.Which one has a better display, "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"?
- 1-6.Which is better in terms of display, "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"?
- 1-7.Which has a better storage capacity, "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"?
- 1-8.How is "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" different from "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" in terms of memory capacity?
- 1-9.Which is better in terms of CPU function, "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"?
- 1-10.How is the battery duration of "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" different from that of "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" ? See the differences
- 2.Compare Performance Specs
Compare Performance and Usability
Size comparison of "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Which one would you choose?
Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is 70.0mm wide, 143.5mm tall, and 7.9mm thick. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 80.9mm tall, 161.7mm wide, and 7.9mm thick.
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is also more compact than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" in terms of the thickness of the devices. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is easier than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" to hold with one hand, and you are less likely to accidentally drop it. If you're looking for a smartphone that fits nicely in your hand and can be gripped firmly, we recommend buying the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" rather than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".
Comparing the width and height of the main unit, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is smaller and more compact than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". As a result, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is easier to operate with one hand and it is more portable without getting in your way than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Therefore, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is recommended.
Comparing the overall sizes, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is significantly smaller than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is more convenient than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" to use with one hand, and it is less likely to get in your way when not using it. If you prefer a smartphone that is easy to carry around and easy to use with one hand, we recommend that you buy the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" rather than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 71/100 | 70.0mm x 143.5mm x 7.9mm |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 52/100 | 80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm |
Which one is easier to hold, "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"? Compare weight
The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" weighs 140.0g. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" clocks in at 210.0g. If you compare the weight of the two, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is a considerably lighter smartphone than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", with a difference of about 70g. Because of this, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" puts less of a burden on the fingers and wrists than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". If you want a smartphone that won't tire your hands out even when using it for a long time, we recommend that you buy the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" rather than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 74/100 | 140.0g |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 48/100 | 210.0g |
Which is better in terms of display, "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"?
Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.
The screen size on the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is 5.2inch, and 6.0inch on the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Comparing the sizes of the screens and displays, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is considerably larger than the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB", with a difference of about 0.7inch. Compared to the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB", the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" makes buttons in apps easier to press, and the visuals look more impressive in videos and games. The larger screen of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" also has the advantage of being less tiring on the eyes. If you want to avoid tapping the wrong place, enjoy videos and games on a large screen, and not get tired eyes while using it, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" rather than the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 77/100 | 5.2inch |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 90/100 | 6.0inch |
Which one has a better display, "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"?
Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.
The screen on the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a 1080 x 1920 resolution and a pixel density of 423ppi. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a pixel density of 367ppi. Comparing the number of pixels on the screen, the pixel density of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is higher than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", with a difference of approximately 56ppi. Therefor, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is better able to display images and videos than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", and is easier on the eyes. For this reason, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is recommended.
- See screen clarity and pixel density ranking of all 5966 smartphone
- ZTE smartphones screen clarity and pixel density ranking
- AXON series smartphones screen clarity and pixel density ranking
- Samsung smartphones screen clarity and pixel density ranking
- Galaxy series smartphones screen clarity and pixel density ranking
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 85/100 | 423ppi |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 77/100 | 367ppi |
How is the battery duration of "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" different from that of "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" ? See the differences
Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh, while the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a 5000.0mAh battery. With regards to battery performance, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a substantially larger battery capacity than the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB", with a difference of 2200mAh. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be used without charging for a longer time than the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB", so it can be used when out and about. If you want a smartphone with a longer-lasting battery, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" rather than the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 62/100 | 2800.0mAh |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 83/100 | 5000.0mAh |
Which is better in terms of CPU function, "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"?
Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is equipped with a Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616 processor, and its performance speed is 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses an Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 CPU that performs at a speed of 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has significantly higher specs than the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB". The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" proves to be more advanced than the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" in the way that apps run quickly and games play smoothly. If you're looking for a high-spec smartphone that runs quickly and plays games smoothly, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" rather than the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 63/100 | 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 75/100 | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
How is "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" different from "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" in terms of memory capacity?
Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has 3.0GB of memory. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", on the other hand, has 4.0GB. As for memory performance, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a larger memory capacity than the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB", with a difference of about 1GB. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has better multitasking, less crashing, and runs 3D games and VR video better than the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB". If you're looking for a smartphone that will remain stable even when you are using multiple apps at the same time, and which will allow you to play 3D games and VR video comfortably, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" rather than the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
Which has a better storage capacity, "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"?
Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has 32.0GB of storage, while the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB. There is no real difference between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB"and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" 's ROMs and storage capacities, so both can store roughly the same amount of photographs and apps. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
Compare the rear cameras of "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Which one has better picture quality?
One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.
The main camera on the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has 13.0MP. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 16.0MP. Comparing the rear camera performance, the number of pixels of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is higher than the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB", with a difference of approximately 3MP. As a result, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can take higher quality scenery photos and make clear prints compared to the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB". Therefore, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is recommended.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 68/100 | 16.0MP |
Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"?
One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.
The forward-facing camera on the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a resolution of 8.0MP. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s has 8.0MP. There is little difference between the camera capabilities and the pixel density of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s front facing cameras, so the quality of photographs and video footage is virtually the same. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Compare Performance Specs
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | ZTE | Samsung |
Release date | 2015-11 | 2016-05 |
Color | Gold/Chromium Silver/Rose Gold | White/Black/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 70.0mm x 143.5mm x 7.9mm | 80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 140.0g | 210.0g |
Display size | 5.2inch | 6.0inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 423ppi | 367ppi |
Battery capacity | 2800.0mAh | 5000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616 | Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 |
CPU specs | 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |