Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB vs ZTE Axon Lux 128GB
Created date: 2018-11-18 11:30:00, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:13:49
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | ZTE Axon Lux 128GB | |||
General rating: | 67.7/100 (The 3505th of all smartphones) | 66.9/100 (The 2061th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 68/100 | 59/100 | ||
Weight | 74/100 | 63/100 | ||
Screen size | 82/100 | 82/100 | ||
Display quality | 85/100 | 88/100 | ||
Battery life | 60/100 | 65/100 | ||
Processing power | 86/100 | 79/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 70/100 | 70/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 67/100 | 90/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 59/100 | 61/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 58/100 | 58/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", performance comparison
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a width of 72.0mm, a length of 141.8mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm. Also, the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" has a width of 75.3mm, a length of 154.5mm, and a thickness of 9.7mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB". For that reason, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB". For that reason, we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is a more compact size than the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB". For that reason the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a large size compared to the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB". For that reason the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB". That's why we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 68/100 | 72.0mm x 141.8mm x 7.9mm |
ZTE Axon Lux 128GB | 59/100 | 75.3mm x 154.5mm x 9.7mm |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is about 140.0g, and the weight of the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" is about 168.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", and there is a difference of about 28g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is superior to the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" over the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 74/100 | 140.0g |
ZTE Axon Lux 128GB | 63/100 | 168.0g |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
ZTE Axon Lux 128GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is 1080 x 2040, and pixel density is 419ppi. Also, the resolution on the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" is 1440 x 2560, and pixel density is 534ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 85/100 | 419ppi |
ZTE Axon Lux 128GB | 88/100 | 534ppi |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is 2700.0mAh, and the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" is 3000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 60/100 | 2700.0mAh |
ZTE Axon Lux 128GB | 65/100 | 3000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630, with performance measured at 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810, with performance measured at 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has higher specs compared to the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB". For that reason, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" over the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 86/100 | 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
ZTE Axon Lux 128GB | 79/100 | 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is 4.0GB and the weight of the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" is 4.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
ZTE Axon Lux 128GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is 64.0GB. Also the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" is 128.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB", with a roughly 64GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" is superior to the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" over the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
ZTE Axon Lux 128GB | 90/100 | 128.0GB |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a 12.0MP main camera. Also, "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 59/100 | 12.0MP |
ZTE Axon Lux 128GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
ZTE Axon Lux 128GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon Lux 128GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | ZTE Axon Lux 128GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Sharp | ZTE |
Release date | 2018-07 | 2015-11 |
Color | Black | Ion Gold/Chromium Silver/Phthalo Blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.0mm x 141.8mm x 7.9mm | 75.3mm x 154.5mm x 9.7mm |
Weight | 140.0g | 168.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2040 | 1440 x 2560 |
Pixel density | 419ppi | 534ppi |
Battery capacity | 2700.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 | Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 |
CPU specs | 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 128.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 12.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |