ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB vs Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-11-18 12:00:35, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:15:15
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Contents
- 1."ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", performance comparison
"ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" has a width of 68.7mm, a length of 146.8mm, and a thickness of 7.6mm. Also, the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB" has a width of 70.8mm, a length of 140.5mm, and a thickness of 9.0mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB". For that reason, the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB". For that reason, we recommend the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB | 74/100 | 68.7mm x 146.8mm x 7.6mm |
Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB | 68/100 | 70.8mm x 140.5mm x 9.0mm |
"ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" is about 135.0g, and the weight of the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB" is about 180.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", and there is a difference of about 45g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" is superior to the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" over the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB | 76/100 | 135.0g |
Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB | 58/100 | 180.0g |
"ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" has a 5.45inch display. Also, the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" has a larger screen compared to the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", with a roughly 0.45inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" than on the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB | 81/100 | 5.45inch |
Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
"ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" is 720 x 1440, and pixel density is 295ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
- See screen clarity and pixel density ranking of all 5966 smartphone
- ZTE smartphones screen clarity and pixel density ranking
- ZTE Blade series smartphones screen clarity and pixel density ranking
- Lenovo smartphones screen clarity and pixel density ranking
- Golden Warrior series smartphones screen clarity and pixel density ranking
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB | 60/100 | 295ppi |
Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB | 59/100 | 293ppi |
"ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" is 3200.0mAh, and the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB" is 2500.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", with a 700mAh difference. Since the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" over the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB | 68/100 | 3200.0mAh |
Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB | 57/100 | 2500.0mAh |
"ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8940 Snapdragon 435, with performance measured at 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6592, with performance measured at 1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" has higher specs compared to the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB". For that reason, the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" over the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB | 71/100 | 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB | 66/100 | 1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" is superior to the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" over the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
"ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" has a greater storage capacity compared to the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", with a roughly 16GB difference. As a result, the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" can take more pictures and videos, and have more applications installed, than the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB". Therefore, we recommend the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
"ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
"ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB" and "Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
ZTE Blade V9 Vita 32GB | Lenovo Golden Warrior A8 16GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | ZTE | Lenovo |
Release date | 2018-08 | 2014-08 |
Color | Black/Blue/Pink/Lime | Black/White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 68.7mm x 146.8mm x 7.6mm | 70.8mm x 140.5mm x 9.0mm |
Weight | 135.0g | 180.0g |
Display size | 5.45inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1440 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 295ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 3200.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8940 Snapdragon 435 | Mediatek MT6592 |
CPU specs | 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |