Compare Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB vs ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB
Created date: 2018-12-10 16:42:27, Updated date: 2021-10-20 13:23:05
How did the evaluations between the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
Contents
- 1."Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", performance comparison
"Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" has a width of 71.2mm, a length of 146.2mm, and a thickness of 9.7mm. Also, the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" has a width of 70.0mm, a length of 140.0mm, and a thickness of 10.0mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB | 66/100 | 71.2mm x 146.2mm x 9.7mm |
ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB | 68/100 | 70.0mm x 140.0mm x 10.0mm |
"Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" is about 150.0g, and the weight of the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" is about 150.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB | 70/100 | 150.0g |
ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB | 70/100 | 150.0g |
"Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" has a 5.45inch display. Also, the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" has a larger screen compared to the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", with a roughly 0.45inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" than on the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB | 81/100 | 5.45inch |
ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
"Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" is 720 x 1440, and pixel density is 295ppi. Also, the resolution on the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 440ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 145ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" is superior to the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" over the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB | 60/100 | 295ppi |
ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB | 85/100 | 440ppi |
"Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" is 3000.0mAh, and the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" is 3200.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB | 65/100 | 3000.0mAh |
ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB | 68/100 | 3200.0mAh |
"Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB"'s CPU is a Unisoc SC9832E, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB"'s CPU is a Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, with performance measured at 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" is superior to the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" over the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB | 36/100 | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB | 55/100 | 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
"Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" has a greater storage capacity compared to the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB", with a roughly 16GB difference. As a result, the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" can take more pictures and videos, and have more applications installed, than the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB". Therefore, we recommend the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
"Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" has a 13.1MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB | 61/100 | 13.1MP |
"Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" has an 1.3MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", with a roughly 6.7MP difference. As a result, the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" is more suited than the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" over the "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB | 7/100 | 1.3MP |
"Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB | ARROWS NX F-01F docomo 32GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Meizu | |
Release date | 2018-12 | 2013-10-24 |
Color | Black/Blue | White/Blue Black/Magenta |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 71.2mm x 146.2mm x 9.7mm | 70.0mm x 140.0mm x 10.0mm |
Weight | 150.0g | 150.0g |
Display size | 5.45inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IGZO IPS LCD | WhiteMagic |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1440 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 295ppi | 440ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 3200.0mAh |
Chipset | Unisoc SC9832E | Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.1MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 1.3MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |