Which should you buy, the Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB or Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB? We offer a thorough comparison of the differences in functions, specifications and performance between the two
Created date: 2019-02-21 05:54:50, Updated date: 2020-04-16 19:44:17
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB | Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 79.1/100 (The 3058th of all smartphones) | 65/100 (The 1163th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 63/100 | 62/100 | ||
Weight | 61/100 | 58/100 | ||
Screen size | 90/100 | 82/100 | ||
Display quality | 84/100 | 85/100 | ||
Battery life | 69/100 | 74/100 | ||
Processing power | 98/100 | 77/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 99/100 | 60/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 91/100 | 50/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 97/100 | 61/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 81/100 | 71/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison
"Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" has a width of 74.7mm, a length of 157.5mm, and a thickness of 7.6mm. Also, the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB" has a width of 74.8mm, a length of 152.5mm, and a thickness of 8.0mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB | 63/100 | 74.7mm x 157.5mm x 7.6mm |
Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB | 62/100 | 74.8mm x 152.5mm x 8.0mm |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" is about 173.0g, and the weight of the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB" is about 181.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB | 61/100 | 173.0g |
Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB | 58/100 | 181.0g |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" has a 6.39inch display. Also, the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" has a larger screen compared to the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 0.88inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" than on the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB | 90/100 | 6.39inch |
Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" is 1080 x 2340, and pixel density is 403ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 400ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB | 84/100 | 403ppi |
Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB | 85/100 | 400ppi |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" is 3300.0mAh, and the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB" is 3600.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB | 69/100 | 3300.0mAh |
Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB | 74/100 | 3600.0mAh |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855, with performance measured at 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB"'s CPU is a Exynos 7870 Octa, with performance measured at 1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" over the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB | 98/100 | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB | 77/100 | 1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" is 12.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 9GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" over the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB | 99/100 | 12.0GB |
Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" is 256.0GB. Also the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 240GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" over the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" has a 48.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 35MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" over the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB | 97/100 | 48.0MP |
Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" has an 20.0MP front camera and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB" has an 13.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 7MP difference. As a result, the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB | 81/100 | 20.0MP |
Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB | 71/100 | 13.0MP |
"Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB" and "Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Xiaomi Mi 9 Explorer 256GB | Galaxy J7 (2017) 16GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Xiaomi | Samsung |
Release date | 2019-06 | 2017-07 |
Color | Transparent Black | Black/Blue/Gold/Rose Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.7mm x 157.5mm x 7.6mm | 74.8mm x 152.5mm x 8.0mm |
Weight | 173.0g | 181.0g |
Display size | 6.39inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 403ppi | 400ppi |
Battery capacity | 3300.0mAh | 3600.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 | Exynos 7870 Octa |
CPU specs | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 20.0MP | 13.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |