Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB vs Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB: Specs & Scores

Created date: 2019-03-19 04:24:18, Updated date: 2020-04-15 16:02:47

Lava Z92 (2019) 32GBGalaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB
Lava Z92 (2019) 32GBGalaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB

How did the evaluations between the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!

Lava Z92 (2019) 32GBGalaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB
Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB

Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.1
61/100
rating-image3.1
62/100
Weightrating-image
- /100
rating-image2.8
55/100
Screen sizerating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image4.5
90/100
Display qualityrating-image2.7
54/100
rating-image4.4
88/100
Battery liferating-image3.4
68/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Processing powerrating-image4.4
88/100
rating-image4.6
91/100
Memory capacityrating-image3.0
60/100
rating-image4.5
90/100
Storage capacityrating-image2.8
55/100
rating-image3.4
67/100
Rear camera performancerating-image3.1
61/100
rating-image3.0
59/100
Front camera performancerating-image2.9
58/100
rating-image2.9
58/100

"Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", performance comparison

"Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" has a width of 75.8mm, a length of 156.9mm, and a thickness of 8.0mm. Also, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has a width of 74.0mm, a length of 158.0mm, and a thickness of 8.9mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB61/10075.8mm x 156.9mm x 8.0mm
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB62/10074.0mm x 158.0mm x 8.9mm

"Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

ScoreWeight
Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB - /100
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB55/100187.0g

"Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" has a 6.22inch display. Also, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has a 6.2inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB90/1006.22inch
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB90/1006.2inch

"Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" is 720 x 1520, and pixel density is 270ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is 1440 x 2960, and pixel density is 530ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB", with a difference of roughly 260ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is superior to the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" over the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB".

ScorePixel density
Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB54/100270ppi
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB88/100530ppi

"Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" is 3260.0mAh, and the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is 3500.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreBattery capacity
Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB68/1003260.0mAh
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB72/1003500.0mAh

"Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22, with performance measured at 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB"'s CPU is a Snapdragon 845 SDM845, with performance measured at 2.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreCPU specs
Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB88/1002.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB91/1002.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is 6.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB", with a difference of about 3GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is superior to the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" over the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB".

ScoreRAM size
Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB60/1003.0GB
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB90/1006.0GB

"Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB", with a roughly 32GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" is superior to the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" over the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB55/10032.0GB
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB67/10064.0GB

"Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has a 12.2MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB61/10013.0MP
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB59/10012.2MP

"Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB58/1008.0MP
Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB58/1008.0MP

"Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Lava Z92 (2019) 32GBGalaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB
ImageLava Z92 (2019) 32GBGalaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB
MakerLava
Release date2019-012018-05-18
ColorGreenMidnight Black/Titanium Gray
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)75.8mm x 156.9mm x 8.0mm74.0mm x 158.0mm x 8.9mm
Display size6.22inch6.2inch
Display typeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 15201440 x 2960
Pixel density270ppi530ppi
Battery capacity3260.0mAh3500.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6762 Helio P22Snapdragon 845 SDM845
CPU specs2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB6.0GB
Storage size32.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP12.2MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB
Articles related to Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB

Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB

Articles related to Lava Z92 (2019) 32GB
Articles related to Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB

Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy S9+ SC-03K docomo 64GB

New articles