BLU Vivo XL5 64GB vs Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2019-09-10 06:07:55, Updated date: 2021-10-20 15:20:30
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Contents
- 1."BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", performance comparison
"BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" has a width of 78.0mm, a length of 161.4mm, and a thickness of 9.6mm. Also, the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" has a width of 77.0mm, a length of 154.0mm, and a thickness of 7.2mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB". For that reason, the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB". For that reason, we recommend the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo XL5 64GB | 54/100 | 78.0mm x 161.4mm x 9.6mm |
Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB | 60/100 | 77.0mm x 154.0mm x 7.2mm |
"BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" is about 181.0g, and the weight of the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" is about 155.3g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB", and there is a difference of about 25.6g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" is superior to the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" over the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo XL5 64GB | 58/100 | 181.0g |
Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB | 68/100 | 155.3g |
"BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" has a 6.3inch display. Also, the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" has a larger screen compared to the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", with a roughly 0.7inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" than on the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo XL5 64GB | 90/100 | 6.3inch |
Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
"BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" is 720 x 1520, and pixel density is 266ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo XL5 64GB | 53/100 | 266ppi |
Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB | 53/100 | 267ppi |
"BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" is 4000.0mAh, and the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" is 3150.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", with a 850mAh difference. Since the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" over the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo XL5 64GB | 80/100 | 4000.0mAh |
Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB | 67/100 | 3150.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
Also, the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6753, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" has higher specs compared to the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB". For that reason, the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" over the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo XL5 64GB | 77/100 | 1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB | 69/100 | 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo XL5 64GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
"BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" is 64.0GB. Also the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", with a roughly 48GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" is superior to the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" over the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo XL5 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
"BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo XL5 64GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" has an 13.0MP front camera and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", with a roughly 8MP difference. As a result, the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" is more suited than the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" over the "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo XL5 64GB | 71/100 | 13.0MP |
Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
"BLU Vivo XL5 64GB" and "Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
BLU Vivo XL5 64GB | Allview V2 Viper X+ 16GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | BLU | Allview |
Release date | 2019-07 | 2015-10 |
Color | Black | Dark blue/Golden pearl |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 78.0mm x 161.4mm x 9.6mm | 77.0mm x 154.0mm x 7.2mm |
Weight | 181.0g | 155.3g |
Display size | 6.3inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1520 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 266ppi | 267ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 3150.0mAh |
CPU specs | 1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |