Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB vs ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB: Specs & Scores

Created date: 2019-09-14 06:34:16, Updated date: 2020-04-16 23:00:46

TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GBZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB
TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GBZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GBZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB
TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB

ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.1
75.5mm x 154.3mm x 7.9mm
rating-image2.9
76.0mm x 154.2mm x 9.1mm
Weightrating-image
rating-image3.3
158.8g
Screen sizerating-image4.5
6.2inch
rating-image4.1
5.5inch
Display qualityrating-image2.7
268ppi
rating-image2.7
267ppi
Battery liferating-image3.6
3500.0mAh
rating-image3.3
3000.0mAh
Processing powerrating-image2.6
2.0GHz×4(4.0-cores)
rating-image1.7
1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image2.5
2.0GB
rating-image2.5
2.0GB
Storage capacityrating-image2.8
32.0GB
rating-image2.5
16.0GB
Rear camera performancerating-image3.1
13.0MP
rating-image3.1
13.0MP
Front camera performancerating-image2.9
8.0MP
rating-image2.5
5.0MP

"TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", performance comparison

"TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" has a width of 75.5mm, a length of 154.3mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm. Also, the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" has a width of 76.0mm, a length of 154.2mm, and a thickness of 9.1mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB61/10075.5mm x 154.3mm x 7.9mm
ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB58/10076.0mm x 154.2mm x 9.1mm

"TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

ScoreWeight
TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB - /100
ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB66/100158.8g

"TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" has a 6.2inch display. Also, the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" has a larger screen compared to the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 0.7inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" than on the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB".

ScoreDisplay size
TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB90/1006.2inch
ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB82/1005.5inch

"TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" is 720 x 1500, and pixel density is 268ppi. Also, the resolution on the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB53/100268ppi
ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB53/100267ppi

"TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" is 3500.0mAh, and the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" is 3000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", with a 500mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" is recommended over the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB72/1003500.0mAh
ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB65/1003000.0mAh

"TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22, with performance measured at 2.0GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" has considerably higher specs than the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" is superior to the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" over the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB".

ScoreCPU specs
TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB52/1002.0GHz×4(4.0-cores)
ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB33/1001.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB50/1002.0GB
ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB50/1002.0GB

"TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" has a greater storage capacity compared to the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 16GB difference. As a result, the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" can take more pictures and videos, and have more applications installed, than the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB". Therefore, we recommend the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB55/10032.0GB
ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB50/10016.0GB

"TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB61/10013.0MP
ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB61/10013.0MP

"TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" has a higher pixel count than the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB58/1008.0MP
ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB50/1005.0MP

"TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GBZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB
ImageTECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GBZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB
MakerTECNOZTE
Release date2019-042016-09
ColorMidnight Black/Champagne Gold/Nebula BlackBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)75.5mm x 154.3mm x 7.9mm76.0mm x 154.2mm x 9.1mm
Display size6.2inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1500720 x 1280
Pixel density268ppi267ppi
Battery capacity3500.0mAh3000.0mAh
CPU specs2.0GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size32.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB
Articles related to ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB

Articles related to TECNO Spark 3 Pro 32GB
Articles related to ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

New articles