Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which should you buy, the Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB or Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB? We offer a thorough comparison of the differences in functions, specifications and performance between the two

Created date: 2019-10-28 20:54:08, Updated date: 2021-10-20 21:26:04

Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GBGalaxy A9 (2016) 32GB
Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GBGalaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.

Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GBGalaxy A9 (2016) 32GB
Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image2.4
80.7mm x 158.5mm x 14.2mm
rating-image2.7
80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.4mm
Weightrating-image2.1
256.0g
rating-image2.5
200.0g
Screen sizerating-image3.8
5.1inch
rating-image4.5
6.0inch
Display qualityrating-image4.5
575ppi
rating-image3.9
367ppi
Battery liferating-image4.1
4500.0mAh
rating-image4.0
4000.0mAh
Processing powerrating-image4.3
2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
rating-image3.5
1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image3.0
3.0GB
rating-image3.0
3.0GB
Storage capacityrating-image2.8
32.0GB
rating-image2.8
32.0GB
Rear camera performancerating-image3.0
12.0MP
rating-image3.1
13.0MP
Front camera performancerating-image2.9
8.0MP
rating-image2.9
8.0MP

"Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", performance comparison

"Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" has a width of 80.7mm, a length of 158.5mm, and a thickness of 14.2mm. Also, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has a width of 80.9mm, a length of 161.7mm, and a thickness of 7.4mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB". For that reason, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB". For that reason, we recommend the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB48/10080.7mm x 158.5mm x 14.2mm
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB53/10080.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.4mm

"Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" is about 256.0g, and the weight of the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is about 200.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB", with a difference of about 56g. For that reason the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" over the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB".

ScoreWeight
Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB41/100256.0g
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB50/100200.0g

"Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" has a 5.1inch display. Also, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has a 6.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB", with a difference of approximately 0.9inch. The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is superior to the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" over the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB".

ScoreDisplay size
Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB75/1005.1inch
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB90/1006.0inch

"Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" is 1440 x 2560, and pixel density is 575ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 367ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", with a difference of roughly 208ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" over the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB".

ScorePixel density
Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB89/100575ppi
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB77/100367ppi

"Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" is 4500.0mAh, and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is 4000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreBattery capacity
Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB81/1004500.0mAh
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB80/1004000.0mAh

"Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB"'s CPU is a Exynos 9810, with performance measured at 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652, with performance measured at 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" over the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB".

ScoreCPU specs
Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB85/1002.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB69/1001.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB60/1003.0GB
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB60/1003.0GB

"Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreStorage size
Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB55/10032.0GB
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB55/10032.0GB

"Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" has a 12.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB59/10012.0MP
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB61/10013.0MP

"Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB58/1008.0MP
Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB58/1008.0MP

"Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GBGalaxy A9 (2016) 32GB
ImageGalaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GBGalaxy A9 (2016) 32GB
MakerSamsungSamsung
Release date2019-112016-01
ColorBlackPearl White/Midnight Black/Champagne Gold/Pink
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)80.7mm x 158.5mm x 14.2mm80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.4mm
Weight256.0g200.0g
Display size5.1inch6.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)1440 x 25601080 x 1920
Pixel density575ppi367ppi
Battery capacity4500.0mAh4000.0mAh
ChipsetExynos 9810Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652
CPU specs2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB3.0GB
Storage size32.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution12.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB
Articles related to Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

Articles related to Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB
Articles related to Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

New articles