Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB vs vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2019-12-16 20:02:30, Updated date: 2021-10-20 18:32:29
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Contents
- 1."Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison
"Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" has a width of 70.9mm, a length of 146.2mm, and a thickness of 8.3mm. Also, the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" has a width of 75.8mm, a length of 153.6mm, and a thickness of 7.5mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB". For that reason, the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB". For that reason, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" has a large size compared to the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB". For that reason the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB". That's why we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB | 69/100 | 70.9mm x 146.2mm x 8.3mm |
vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB | 62/100 | 75.8mm x 153.6mm x 7.5mm |
"Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" is about 149.0g, and the weight of the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" is about 157.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB | 70/100 | 149.0g |
vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB | 67/100 | 157.0g |
"Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" has a 5.7inch display. Also, the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB | 85/100 | 5.7inch |
vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
"Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" is 720 x 1520, and pixel density is 295ppi. Also, the resolution on the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" has a higher pixel density than the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 28ppi. As a result, images and videos on the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" have better picture quality than on the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", and the former is also easier on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB | 60/100 | 295ppi |
vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB | 53/100 | 267ppi |
"Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" is 3000.0mAh, and the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" is 3000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB | 65/100 | 3000.0mAh |
vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB | 65/100 | 3000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439, with performance measured at 1.95GHz+1.45GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425, with performance measured at 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" has higher specs compared to the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB". For that reason, the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" over the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB | 60/100 | 1.95GHz+1.45GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB | 51/100 | 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" over the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
"Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" has a greater storage capacity compared to the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 16GB difference. As a result, the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" can take more pictures and videos, and have more applications installed, than the "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB". Therefore, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
"Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
"Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB" and "vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Samsung Galaxy A01 32GB | vivo Y65 (2017) 16GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Samsung | vivo |
Release date | 2020-01-17 | 2017-11 |
Color | Black/Blue/Red | Gold/Matte Black/Rose Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 70.9mm x 146.2mm x 8.3mm | 75.8mm x 153.6mm x 7.5mm |
Weight | 149.0g | 157.0g |
Display size | 5.7inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | PLS TFT | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1520 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 295ppi | 267ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 | Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 |
CPU specs | 1.95GHz+1.45GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |