Should you buy Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB or Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly
Created date: 2020-01-07 19:12:45, Updated date: 2021-10-20 19:59:16
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Contents
- 1."Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", performance comparison
"Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has a width of 79.2mm, a length of 164.8mm, and a thickness of 18.2mm. Also, the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" has a width of 74.8mm, a length of 155.5mm, and a thickness of 8.5mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB". The "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" excels over the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" over the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" has a large size compared to the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB". For that reason the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB". That's why we recommend the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | 47/100 | 79.2mm x 164.8mm x 18.2mm |
Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB | 62/100 | 74.8mm x 155.5mm x 8.5mm |
"Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is about 373.7g, and the weight of the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" is about 177.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB", and there is a difference of about 196.7g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" is superior to the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" over the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | 24/100 | 373.7g |
Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB | 59/100 | 177.0g |
"Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has a 5.7inch display. Also, the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" has a 6.2inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" has a larger screen compared to the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB", with a roughly 0.5inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" than on the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | 85/100 | 5.7inch |
Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB | 90/100 | 6.2inch |
"Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is 1080 x 2160, and pixel density is 423ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" is 1080 x 2246, and pixel density is 401ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | 85/100 | 423ppi |
Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB | 84/100 | 401ppi |
"Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is 10300.0mAh, and the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" is 4000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", with a 6300mAh difference. Since the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" over the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | 98/100 | 10300.0mAh |
Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB | 80/100 | 4000.0mAh |
"Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70, with performance measured at 2.1GHz+2.1GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6750, with performance measured at 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is superior to the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" over the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | 90/100 | 2.1GHz+2.1GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB | 67/100 | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is 6.0GB and the weight of the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" is 4.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", with a difference of about 2GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is superior to the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" over the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | 90/100 | 6.0GB |
Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
"Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is 64.0GB. Also the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
"Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has a 21.0MP main camera. Also, "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is superior to the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" over the "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | 80/100 | 21.0MP |
Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB | 68/100 | 16.0MP |
"Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | Coolpad Cool Play 8 64GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Ulefone | Coolpad |
Release date | 2019-09 | 2018-12 |
Color | Black | Black/Red |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 79.2mm x 164.8mm x 18.2mm | 74.8mm x 155.5mm x 8.5mm |
Weight | 373.7g | 177.0g |
Display size | 5.7inch | 6.2inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2160 | 1080 x 2246 |
Pixel density | 423ppi | 401ppi |
Battery capacity | 10300.0mAh | 4000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 | Mediatek MT6750 |
CPU specs | 2.1GHz+2.1GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 6.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 21.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |