Galaxy Z Flip 256GB vs Lava A73 (2017) 8GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2020-02-10 15:14:45, Updated date: 2022-06-02 17:35:29
How did the evaluations between the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
Galaxy Z Flip 256GB | Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | |||
General rating: | 74.8/100 (The 3283th of all smartphones) | 35.3/100 (The 2851th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 66/100 | 64/100 | ||
Weight | 57/100 | - /100 | ||
Screen size | 91/100 | 74/100 | ||
Display quality | 85/100 | 25/100 | ||
Battery life | 69/100 | 50/100 | ||
Processing power | 96/100 | 14/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 93/100 | 20/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 91/100 | 24/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 59/100 | 27/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 64/100 | 50/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", performance comparison
"Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" has a width of 73.6mm, a length of 167.3mm, and a thickness of 7.2mm. Also, the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" has a width of 72.8mm, a length of 145.5mm, and a thickness of 9.3mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" is a more compact size than the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB". For that reason the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Z Flip 256GB | 66/100 | 73.6mm x 167.3mm x 7.2mm |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 64/100 | 72.8mm x 145.5mm x 9.3mm |
"Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Z Flip 256GB | 57/100 | 183.0g |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | - /100 |
"Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" has a 6.7inch display. Also, the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", with a difference of approximately 1.7inch. The "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" is superior to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" over the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Z Flip 256GB | 91/100 | 6.7inch |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
"Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" is 1080 x 2636, and pixel density is 425ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" is 480 x 854, and pixel density is 195ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", with a difference of roughly 230ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" is superior to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" over the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Z Flip 256GB | 85/100 | 425ppi |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 25/100 | 195ppi |
"Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" is 3300.0mAh, and the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" is 2000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", with a 1300mAh difference. Since the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" over the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Z Flip 256GB | 69/100 | 3300.0mAh |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 50/100 | 2000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+, with performance measured at 2.95GHz+2.41GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" is superior to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" over the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Z Flip 256GB | 96/100 | 2.95GHz+2.41GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 14/100 | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" is 8.0GB and the weight of the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" is 1.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", with a difference of about 7GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" is superior to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" over the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Z Flip 256GB | 93/100 | 8.0GB |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 20/100 | 1.0GB |
"Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" is 256.0GB. Also the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" is 8.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", with a roughly 248GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" is superior to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" over the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Z Flip 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 24/100 | 8.0GB |
"Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" has a 12.0MP main camera. Also, "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" has a 5.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", with a roughly 7MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" is superior to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" over the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Z Flip 256GB | 59/100 | 12.0MP |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 27/100 | 5.0MP |
"Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" has an 10.0MP front camera and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. As a result, the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" is more suited than the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" over the "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Z Flip 256GB | 64/100 | 10.0MP |
Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
"Galaxy Z Flip 256GB" and "Lava A73 (2017) 8GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Galaxy Z Flip 256GB | Lava A73 (2017) 8GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Samsung | Lava |
Release date | 2020-02-14 | 2017-02 |
Color | Mirror Black/Mirror Purple/Mirror Gold | Dark Gray |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.6mm x 167.3mm x 7.2mm | 72.8mm x 145.5mm x 9.3mm |
Display size | 6.7inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED | TN |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2636 | 480 x 854 |
Pixel density | 425ppi | 195ppi |
Battery capacity | 3300.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
CPU specs | 2.95GHz+2.41GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 12.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 10.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |