Which one is better, the ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB or Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:14:12, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:19:02
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" or "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
The design of Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB
The "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" is 143.2mm long, 71.0mm wide, and 8.4mm thick. It weighs 148.0g.
The design of ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is 129.0mm long, 65.0mm wide, and 10.8mm thick. It weighs 151.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 14.1mm in length, 6mm in width, and 2.4mm in thickness. Both the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is bigger than "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 3g. There is very little difference in weight between the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.
Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 70/100 | 74/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 55/100 | 52/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 63/100 | 66/100 |
Compare the display of the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
Display of the Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB
The "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" uses a HD Super Clear Panel liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 312ppi. The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. In the gaming end, the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size.
The display of "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" looks sleeker than that of "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. The "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 63/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 48/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
Camera performance of Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB
The main camera of the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
The main camera of the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has 13.1MP. The front camera has 1.2MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 5.1MP difference in comparison. The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3.8MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 50/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 46/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
The processing capability of the Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6737 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" uses the Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
"Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" equally.
There is basically no difference between "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" than the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB".
Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 73/100 | 72/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 45/100 | 33/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
Battery performance of Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB
The "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2620.0mAh.
Battery performance of ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2420.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" over the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB". Both the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 88/100 | 74/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 75/100 | 52/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
The storage capacity of the Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB
The "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 48GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" is recommended over "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos. Both the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 76/100 | 70/100 |
Which to buy, the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" or "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" or "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB". If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB". "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 64/100 | 66/100 |
Display | 56/100 | 53/100 |
CPU specs | 56/100 | 49/100 |
General rating | 62/100 | 60/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Lava Z10 (2017) 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
Color | Gold/Black+White | / / / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 71.0mm x 143.2mm x 8.4mm | 65.0mm x 129.0mm x 10.8mm |
Weight | 148.0g | 151.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 4.7inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | HD Super Clear Panel |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 312ppi |
Battery capacity | 2620.0mAh | 2420.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6737 | Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064 |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 13.1MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 1.2MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |