LG X power (2016) 16GB vs ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:37:29, Updated date: 2020-04-15 14:15:14
How are the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
LG X power (2016) 16GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |||
General rating: | 51.1/100 (The 1486th of all smartphones) | 56.8/100 (The 422th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 62/100 | 62/100 | ||
Screen quality | 60/100 | 70/100 | ||
Performance | 48/100 | 51/100 | ||
Storage size | 70/100 | 84/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 81/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 65/100 | 46/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" or "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" ?
What is the difference between the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
The design of LG X power (2016) 16GB
The "LG X power (2016) 16GB" is 148.9mm long, 74.9mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 139.0g.
The design of ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is 139.0mm long, 69.0mm wide, and 9.8mm thick. It weighs 158.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 9.9mm in length, 5.9mm in width, and 1.9mm in thickness. "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is bigger than "LG X power (2016) 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 19g. The "LG X power (2016) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
LG X power (2016) 16GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 65/100 | 71/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 62/100 | 47/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 60/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the display of the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
Display of the LG X power (2016) 16GB
The "LG X power (2016) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 277ppi. The "LG X power (2016) 16GB" has a 5.3inch screen size.
Display of the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "LG X power (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "LG X power (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "LG X power (2016) 16GB". The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
LG X power (2016) 16GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 70/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 71/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
Camera performance of LG X power (2016) 16GB
The main camera of the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
The main camera of the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has 13.1MP. The front camera has 1.25MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3.75MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "LG X power (2016) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "LG X power (2016) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
LG X power (2016) 16GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 46/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
The processing capability of the LG X power (2016) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6735 ,Mediatek MT6755M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" uses the Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T SoC. The CPU performance is 1.7GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
"ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" equally.
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used.
LG X power (2016) 16GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 71/100 | 73/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 32/100 | 35/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
Battery performance of LG X power (2016) 16GB
The "LG X power (2016) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 4100.0mAh.
Battery performance of ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3020.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1080mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "LG X power (2016) 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" over the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". Both the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "LG X power (2016) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
LG X power (2016) 16GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 81/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
The storage capacity of the LG X power (2016) 16GB
The "LG X power (2016) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 48GB. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 144GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "LG X power (2016) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
LG X power (2016) 16GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 84/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 75/100 |
Which to buy, the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" or "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" or "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" a lot easier to use. There isn't much difference between "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
LG X power (2016) 16GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 62/100 | 62/100 |
Display | 60/100 | 70/100 |
CPU specs | 48/100 | 51/100 |
General rating | 66/100 | 66/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the LG X power (2016) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "LG X power (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
LG X power (2016) 16GB | ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB | |
Color | Indigo/White/Gold | / / / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.9mm x 148.9mm x 7.9mm | 69.0mm x 139.0mm x 9.8mm |
Weight | 139.0g | 158.0g |
Display size | 5.3inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 277ppi | 440ppi |
Battery capacity | 4100.0mAh | 3020.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6735 ,Mediatek MT6755M | Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.7GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.1MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 1.25MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |