Which one is better, the BLU S1 (2017) 16GB or Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:07:42, Updated date: 2021-10-20 22:19:40
How are the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | BLU S1 (2017) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 63.2/100 (The 1195th of all smartphones) | 51.8/100 (The 554th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 42/100 | 64/100 | ||
Screen quality | 74/100 | 60/100 | ||
Performance | 82/100 | 54/100 | ||
Storage size | 78/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 90/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 80/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 80/100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" or "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"
The design of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 161.7mm long, 80.9mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 210.0g.
The design of BLU S1 (2017) 16GB
The "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" is 147.3mm long, 72.8mm wide, and 8.4mm thick. It weighs 137.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 14.3mm in length, 8.1mm in width, and 0.5mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" is more compact than "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 73g. The "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | BLU S1 (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 52/100 | 68/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 12/100 | 64/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 54/100 | 62/100 |
Compare the display of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"
Display of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 367ppi. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.
Display of the BLU S1 (2017) 16GB
The "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 282ppi. The "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB". The "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | BLU S1 (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 76/100 | 70/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 78/100 | 70/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"
Camera performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The main camera of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of BLU S1 (2017) 16GB
The main camera of the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | BLU S1 (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 80/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"
The processing capability of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the BLU S1 (2017) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6750 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB", the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" than the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB". The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | BLU S1 (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 85/100 | 74/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 79/100 | 37/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"
Battery performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.
Battery performance of BLU S1 (2017) 16GB
The "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" over the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB". Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | BLU S1 (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 90/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 78/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the BLU S1 (2017) 16GB
The "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 208GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | BLU S1 (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 67/100 |
Which to buy, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" or "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" or "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.0inch makes the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB", the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | BLU S1 (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 42/100 | 64/100 |
Display | 74/100 | 60/100 |
CPU specs | 82/100 | 54/100 |
General rating | 75/100 | 64/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the BLU S1 (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "BLU S1 (2017) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | BLU S1 (2017) 16GB | |
Color | White/Black/Gold | Black/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm | 72.8mm x 147.3mm x 8.4mm |
Weight | 210.0g | 137.0g |
Display size | 6.0inch | 5.2inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 367ppi | 282ppi |
Battery capacity | 5000.0mAh | 2800.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 | Mediatek MT6750 |
CPU specs | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |