Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB vs Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:04:45, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:31:54

Spice N-300 (2014) 4GBOppo F1s (2016) 64GB
Spice N-300 (2014) 4GBOppo F1s (2016) 64GB

How are the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" and "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Spice N-300 (2014) 4GBOppo F1s (2016) 64GB
Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB

Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.6
52/100
rating-image2.9
57/100
Screen qualityrating-image2.4
48/100
rating-image3.1
61/100
Performancerating-image1
17/100
rating-image4.3
86/100
Storage sizerating-image1
17/100
rating-image4.2
84/100
Batteryrating-image3.2
64/100
rating-image4.4
88/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image5.0
100/100

What is the difference between the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" and the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" and "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB"

The design of Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB

The "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" is 150.4mm long, 74.8mm wide, and 9.8mm thick. It weighs 180.0g.

The design of Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB

The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is 154.5mm long, 76.0mm wide, and 7.4mm thick. It weighs 160.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 4mm in length, 1.2mm in width, and 2.4mm in thickness. Both the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" and "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" and "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB". Both the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" and "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 20g. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB

Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB

Ease of holding it in one hand61/10063/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand32/10046/100
Ease of carrying around58/10059/100

Compare the display of the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" and "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB"

Display of the Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB

The "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Display of the Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB

The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" nor the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB

Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?68/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?60/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" and "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB"

Camera performance of Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB

The main camera of the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Camera performance of Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB

The main camera of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 14MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB

Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?50/100100/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" and "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB"

The processing capability of the Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" uses the Mediatek MT6571 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.

The processing capability of the Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" uses the Mediatek MT6755 or MTK7650 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB", the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 508MB difference in memory capacity. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB". The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" than the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB". The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB

Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet28/10088/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games4/10082/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" and "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB"

Battery performance of Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB

The "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB

The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3075.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1075mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" over the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB". The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB

Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet64/10088/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos40/10076/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" and "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB"

The storage capacity of the Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB

The "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB

The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 60GB. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 284GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB

Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games17/10084/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos55/10091/100

Which to buy, the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" or "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" or "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" and "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB". Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB", the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is overall the clear winner.

Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB

Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB

Handling52/10057/100
Display48/10061/100
CPU specs17/10086/100
General rating41/10075/100

Is it recommended to buy the Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. Judging from the overall specs, the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" and "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Spice N-300 (2014) 4GB" and "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Spice N-300 (2014) 4GBOppo F1s (2016) 64GB
Spice N-300 (2014) 4GBOppo F1s (2016) 64GB
ColorBlueGold/Rose Gold/Gray
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)74.8mm x 150.4mm x 9.8mm76.0mm x 154.5mm x 7.4mm
Weight180.0g160.0g
Display size5.0inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 854720 x 1280
Pixel density195ppi267ppi
Battery capacity2000.0mAh3075.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6571Mediatek MT6755 or MTK7650
CPU specs1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores)1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size512.0MB4.0GB
Storage size4.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution2.0MP16.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles