Which one is better, the ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB or Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:14:15, Updated date: 2020-04-15 19:51:00
How are the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |||
General rating: | 50.8/100 (The 1493th of all smartphones) | 51.3/100 (The 567th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 45/100 | 66/100 | ||
Screen quality | 61/100 | 53/100 | ||
Performance | 48/100 | 49/100 | ||
Storage size | 70/100 | 78/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 74/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 65/100 | 46/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" or "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
The design of Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB
The "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" is 154.4mm long, 77.2mm wide, and 10.6mm thick. It weighs 201.0g.
The design of ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is 129.0mm long, 65.0mm wide, and 10.8mm thick. It weighs 151.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 25.4mm in length, 12.2mm in width, and 0.2mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 50g. The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 54/100 | 74/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 18/100 | 52/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 55/100 | 66/100 |
Compare the display of the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
Display of the Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB
The "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" uses a HD Super Clear Panel liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 312ppi. The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. The "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 63/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 48/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
Camera performance of Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB
The main camera of the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
The main camera of the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has 13.1MP. The front camera has 1.2MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3.8MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 46/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
The processing capability of the Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" uses the Cortex-A53 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" uses the Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" equally.
There is basically no difference between "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used.
Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 71/100 | 72/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 32/100 | 33/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
Battery performance of Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB
The "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Battery performance of ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2420.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1580mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" over the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB". Both the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 74/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 52/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
The storage capacity of the Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB
The "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" or "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB". The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 67/100 | 70/100 |
Which to buy, the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" or "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" or "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" is recommended as it has a 5.5inch screen. There isn't much difference between "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 45/100 | 66/100 |
Display | 61/100 | 53/100 |
CPU specs | 48/100 | 49/100 |
General rating | 62/100 | 60/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Wiko Ufeel fab 16GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
Color | Black/Gold/Rose Gold | / / / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 77.2mm x 154.4mm x 10.6mm | 65.0mm x 129.0mm x 10.8mm |
Weight | 201.0g | 151.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 4.7inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | HD Super Clear Panel |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 312ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 2420.0mAh |
Chipset | Cortex-A53 | Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064 |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.1MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 1.2MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |