Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB vs. ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:39:02, Updated date: 2020-04-16 17:08:38

BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

How are the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.7
74.0mm x 146.0mm x 10.1mm
rating-image3.1
69.0mm x 139.0mm x 9.8mm
Screen qualityrating-image2.4
TFT, 5.0inch, 480 x 854
rating-image3.5
TFT, 5.0inch, 1080 x 1920
Performancerating-image1
Cortex-A7, 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores), 512.0MB
rating-image2.6
Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T, 1.7GHz×4(4.0-cores), 2.0GB
Storage sizerating-image1
4.0GB
rating-image4.2
64.0GB
Batteryrating-image3.4
2100.0mAh
rating-image4.1
3020.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.9
15.0MP
rating-image3.6
13.1MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image
rating-image2.3
1.25MP

What is the difference between the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

The design of BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB

The "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" is 146.0mm long, 74.0mm wide, and 10.1mm thick. It weighs 174.0g.

The design of ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is 139.0mm long, 69.0mm wide, and 9.8mm thick. It weighs 158.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 7mm in length, 5mm in width, and 0.2mm in thickness. "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is bigger than "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is more compact than "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 16g. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Ease of holding it in one hand62/10071/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand36/10047/100
Ease of carrying around59/10064/100

Compare the display of the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

Display of the BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB

The "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Display of the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size.

In terms of display, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB". The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?68/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?60/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

Camera performance of BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB

The main camera of the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" has 15.0MP.

Camera performance of ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

The main camera of the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has 13.1MP. The front camera has 1.25MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 1.9MP difference in comparison. There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, for taking photos of objects in close proximity such as desserts or food that can be posted on Instagram, the camera of "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" has a better performance. Both the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?77/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? - 46/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

The processing capability of the BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" uses the Cortex-A7 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.

The processing capability of the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" uses the Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T SoC. The CPU performance is 1.7GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB", the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 510MB difference in memory capacity. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". The "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" than the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB". The "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet24/10073/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games4/10035/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

Battery performance of BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB

The "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" has a battery capacity of 2100.0mAh.

Battery performance of ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3020.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 920mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" over the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB". The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.

BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet68/10081/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos43/10064/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

The storage capacity of the BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB

The "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 60GB. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 92GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games17/10084/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos55/10075/100

Which to buy, the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" or "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" or "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"?

"ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" and the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB", the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is overall the clear winner.

BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Handling54/10062/100
Display48/10070/100
CPU specs15/10051/100
General rating39/10066/100

Is it recommended to buy the BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
BLU Studio 5.0 E 4GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
ColorBlack/White/ / /
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)74.0mm x 146.0mm x 10.1mm69.0mm x 139.0mm x 9.8mm
Weight174.0g158.0g
Display size5.0inch5.0inch
Display typeTFTTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 8541080 x 1920
Pixel density195ppi440ppi
Battery capacity2100.0mAh3020.0mAh
ChipsetCortex-A7Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T
CPU specs1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores)1.7GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size512.0MB2.0GB
Storage size4.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution15.0MP13.1MP
Front-camera resolution1.25MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles