Galaxy Ace Style 4GB vs. ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:27:49, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:47:14
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB".
Galaxy Ace Style 4GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |||
General rating: | 37.7/100 (The 2756th of all smartphones) | 51.3/100 (The 567th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 74/100 | 66/100 | ||
Screen quality | 34/100 | 53/100 | ||
Performance | 16/100 | 49/100 | ||
Storage size | 17/100 | 78/100 | ||
Battery | 59/100 | 74/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 35/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | - /100 | 46/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" or "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
The design of Galaxy Ace Style 4GB
The "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" is 121.2mm long, 62.7mm wide, and 10.7mm thick. It weighs 123.0g.
The design of ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is 129.0mm long, 65.0mm wide, and 10.8mm thick. It weighs 151.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 7.7mm in length, 2.2mm in width, and 0.1mm in thickness. Both the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB". Both the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 28g. The "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Galaxy Ace Style 4GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 77/100 | 74/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 75/100 | 52/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 69/100 | 66/100 |
Compare the display of the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
Display of the Galaxy Ace Style 4GB
The "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" has a 4.0inch screen size.
Display of the ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" uses a HD Super Clear Panel liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 312ppi. The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. In the gaming end, the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. The "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy Ace Style 4GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 46/100 | 63/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 25/100 | 48/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
Camera performance of Galaxy Ace Style 4GB
The main camera of the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
The main camera of the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has 13.1MP. The front camera has 1.2MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 8.1MP difference in comparison. The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy Ace Style 4GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 35/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | - | 46/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
The processing capability of the Galaxy Ace Style 4GB
The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
The processing capability of the ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" uses the Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB", the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 510MB difference in memory capacity. The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB". The "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" than the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB". The "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy Ace Style 4GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 27/100 | 72/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 4/100 | 33/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
Battery performance of Galaxy Ace Style 4GB
The "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1500.0mAh.
Battery performance of ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2420.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 920mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" over the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB". The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
Galaxy Ace Style 4GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 59/100 | 74/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 37/100 | 52/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
The storage capacity of the Galaxy Ace Style 4GB
The "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB
The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 28GB. The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 28GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" or "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB". The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy Ace Style 4GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 17/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 65/100 | 70/100 |
Which to buy, the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" or "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" or "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB"?
"Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 4.7inch makes the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" and the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB", the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
Galaxy Ace Style 4GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 74/100 | 66/100 |
Display | 34/100 | 53/100 |
CPU specs | 16/100 | 49/100 |
General rating | 40/100 | 60/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy Ace Style 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. Judging from the overall specs, the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy Ace Style 4GB" and "ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Galaxy Ace Style 4GB | ARROWS A 201F SoftBank 32GB | |
Color | Cream White/Dark Gray | / / / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 62.7mm x 121.2mm x 10.7mm | 65.0mm x 129.0mm x 10.8mm |
Weight | 123.0g | 151.0g |
Display size | 4.0inch | 4.7inch |
Display type | TFT | HD Super Clear Panel |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 800 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 233ppi | 312ppi |
Battery capacity | 1500.0mAh | 2420.0mAh |
Chipset | Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064 | |
CPU specs | 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 13.1MP |
Front-camera resolution | 1.2MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |