Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

A comparive review of the differences between the Allview P8 Energy 16GB and ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB. We covered a wide range of variables

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:20:02, Updated date: 2020-04-16 22:47:22

ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GBAllview P8 Energy 16GB
ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GBAllview P8 Energy 16GB

How are the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GBAllview P8 Energy 16GB
ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

Allview P8 Energy 16GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.8
55/100
rating-image2.4
47/100
Screen qualityrating-image3.1
61/100
rating-image3.1
61/100
Performancerating-image2.4
47/100
rating-image2.4
48/100
Storage sizerating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image3.5
70/100
Batteryrating-image4.4
87/100
rating-image5.0
100/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
72/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
65/100
rating-image3.3
65/100

What is the difference between the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and the "Allview P8 Energy 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB"

The design of ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

The "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" is 154.2mm long, 76.0mm wide, and 9.1mm thick. It weighs 158.8g.

The design of Allview P8 Energy 16GB

The "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" is 152.0mm long, 76.0mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 212.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

Both the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB". Both the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 53.1g. The "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

Allview P8 Energy 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand60/10061/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand46/10011/100
Ease of carrying around58/10058/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB"

Display of the ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

The "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the Allview P8 Energy 16GB

The "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and the "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and the "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" nor the "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

Allview P8 Energy 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB"

Camera performance of ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of Allview P8 Energy 16GB

The main camera of the "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and the "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

Allview P8 Energy 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB"

The processing capability of the ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the Allview P8 Energy 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6735 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and the "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and the "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" equally.

There is basically no difference between "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used.

ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

Allview P8 Energy 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet70/10071/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games31/10032/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB"

Battery performance of ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

The "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Allview P8 Energy 16GB

The "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" has a battery capacity of 6000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 3000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" over the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB". Both the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and the "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and the "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

Allview P8 Energy 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet87/100100/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos74/100100/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB"

The storage capacity of the ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

The "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Allview P8 Energy 16GB

The "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" or "Allview P8 Energy 16GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 128GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and the "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

Allview P8 Energy 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10076/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" or "Allview P8 Energy 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" or "Allview P8 Energy 16GB"?

"ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB". There isn't much difference between "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB

Allview P8 Energy 16GB

Handling55/10047/100
Display61/10061/100
CPU specs47/10048/100
General rating62/10064/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Allview P8 Energy 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" and "Allview P8 Energy 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GBAllview P8 Energy 16GB
ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GBAllview P8 Energy 16GB
ColorBlackBlack/White/Brown
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.0mm x 154.2mm x 9.1mm76.0mm x 152.0mm x 8.5mm
Weight158.8g212.0g
Display size5.5inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDAMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density267ppi267ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh6000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6735
CPU specs1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles