Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

ZTE Axon mini 32GB vs Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:37:45, Updated date: 2021-10-20 23:26:22

ZTE Axon mini 32GBLava V2 s (2016) 8GB
ZTE Axon mini 32GBLava V2 s (2016) 8GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB".

ZTE Axon mini 32GBLava V2 s (2016) 8GB
ZTE Axon mini 32GB

Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB

General rating:
Griprating-image3.3
70.0mm x 143.5mm x 7.9mm
rating-image3.4
70.8mm x 141.6mm x 8.0mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.7
Super AMOLED, 5.2inch, 1080 x 1920
rating-image2.8
IPS LCD, 5.0inch, 720 x 1280
Performancerating-image3.4
Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616, 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores), 3.0GB
rating-image2.2
1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores), 2.0GB
Storage sizerating-image3.9
32.0GB
rating-image1.8
8.0GB
Batteryrating-image4.2
2800.0mAh
rating-image4.1
2500.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
13.0MP
rating-image2.5
8.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
8.0MP
rating-image4.0
8.0MP

What is the difference between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB"

The design of ZTE Axon mini 32GB

The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is 143.5mm long, 70.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 140.0g.

The design of Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB

The "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" is 141.6mm long, 70.8mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 129.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB". Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 11g. "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" weighs less than "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and is easier to handle.

ZTE Axon mini 32GB

Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB

Ease of holding it in one hand71/10071/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand61/10070/100
Ease of carrying around64/10064/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB"

Display of the ZTE Axon mini 32GB

The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.

Display of the Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB

The "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB". The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

ZTE Axon mini 32GB

Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?70/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?70/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB"

Camera performance of ZTE Axon mini 32GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB

The main camera of the "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

ZTE Axon mini 32GB

Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB"

The processing capability of the ZTE Axon mini 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB

The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB", the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB". The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" than the "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB". The "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Axon mini 32GB

Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet79/10067/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games54/10030/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB"

Battery performance of ZTE Axon mini 32GB

The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh.

Battery performance of Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB

The "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 300mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB". Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices.

ZTE Axon mini 32GB

Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet83/10082/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos67/10066/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB"

The storage capacity of the ZTE Axon mini 32GB

The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB

The "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 24GB. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 248GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Axon mini 32GB

Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10035/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10056/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB". Its perfect screen size of 5.2inch makes the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB", the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is overall the clear winner.

ZTE Axon mini 32GB

Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB

Handling66/10068/100
Display74/10056/100
CPU specs68/10044/100
General rating72/10056/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Axon mini 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Lava V2 s (2016) 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE Axon mini 32GBLava V2 s (2016) 8GB
ZTE Axon mini 32GBLava V2 s (2016) 8GB
ColorGold/Chromium Silver/Rose GoldWhite/Black
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)70.0mm x 143.5mm x 7.9mm70.8mm x 141.6mm x 8.0mm
Weight140.0g129.0g
Display size5.2inch5.0inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 1920720 x 1280
Pixel density423ppi293ppi
Battery capacity2800.0mAh2500.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616
CPU specs1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB2.0GB
Storage size32.0GB8.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles