A comparive review of the differences between the vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB and ZTE Axon mini 32GB. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:31:41, Updated date: 2021-10-20 18:22:58
Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"
The design of ZTE Axon mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is 143.5mm long, 70.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 140.0g.
The design of vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB
The "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" is 154.5mm long, 74.8mm wide, and 7.4mm thick. It weighs 156.2g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 11mm in length, 4.7mm in width, and 0.5mm in thickness. "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is bigger than "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 16.1g. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 71/100 | 66/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 61/100 | 48/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 64/100 | 61/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"
Display of the ZTE Axon mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.
Display of the vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB
The "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2280, and the pixel density is 401ppi. The "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" has a 6.28inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.08inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" offers a more suitable screen size. Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 70/100 | 78/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 70/100 | 82/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"
Camera performance of ZTE Axon mini 32GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB
The main camera of the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 12.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 1MP difference in comparison. There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 4MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 70/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 100/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Axon mini 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB", the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 3GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB". Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" than the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB". The "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 79/100 | 98/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 54/100 | 94/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"
Battery performance of ZTE Axon mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh.
Battery performance of vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB
The "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" has a battery capacity of 3200.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 400mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" slightly more. Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 83/100 | 90/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 67/100 | 78/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Axon mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB
The "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" has 128.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 96GB. The "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 96GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB". Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 90/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 92/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB"?
"ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. If you want a larger screen, "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" is recommended as it has a 6.28inch screen. The "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" and "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" overall, "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 66/100 | 59/100 |
Display | 74/100 | 79/100 |
CPU specs | 68/100 | 96/100 |
General rating | 72/100 | 81/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Axon mini 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | vivo X21 UD (2018) 128GB | |
Color | Gold/Chromium Silver/Rose Gold | Black/Ruby Red |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 70.0mm x 143.5mm x 7.9mm | 74.8mm x 154.5mm x 7.4mm |
Weight | 140.0g | 156.2g |
Display size | 5.2inch | 6.28inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 1080 x 2280 |
Pixel density | 423ppi | 401ppi |
Battery capacity | 2800.0mAh | 3200.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616 | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 |
CPU specs | 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 6.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 128.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 12.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 12.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |