Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

ZTE Axon mini 32GB vs vivo V5s (2017) 64GB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2018-09-30 21:15:54, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:38:46

ZTE Axon mini 32GBvivo V5s (2017) 64GB
ZTE Axon mini 32GBvivo V5s (2017) 64GB

How are the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

ZTE Axon mini 32GBvivo V5s (2017) 64GB
ZTE Axon mini 32GB

vivo V5s (2017) 64GB

General rating:

56.7/100

(The 2231th of all smartphones)

58.7/100

(The 1303th of all smartphones)

Grip
66/100
58/100
Screen quality
74/100
61/100
Performance
68/100
76/100
Storage size
78/100
84/100
Battery
83/100
90/100
Rear-camera resolution
72/100
72/100
Front-camera resolution
80/100
100/100

What is the difference between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB"

The design of ZTE Axon mini 32GB

The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is 143.5mm long, 70.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 140.0g.

The design of vivo V5s (2017) 64GB

The "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" is 153.8mm long, 75.5mm wide, and 7.6mm thick. It weighs 154.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 10.3mm in length, 5.5mm in width, and 0.3mm in thickness. "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is bigger than "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 14g. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

ZTE Axon mini 32GB

vivo V5s (2017) 64GB

Ease of holding it in one hand71/10064/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand61/10050/100
Ease of carrying around64/10060/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB"

Display of the ZTE Axon mini 32GB

The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.

Display of the vivo V5s (2017) 64GB

The "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB". The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

ZTE Axon mini 32GB

vivo V5s (2017) 64GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?70/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?70/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB"

Camera performance of ZTE Axon mini 32GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of vivo V5s (2017) 64GB

The main camera of the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 20.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 12MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

ZTE Axon mini 32GB

vivo V5s (2017) 64GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/100100/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB"

The processing capability of the ZTE Axon mini 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the vivo V5s (2017) 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" uses the Mediatek MT6750 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

The CPU specs are the same for both phones. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" equally. Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is basically no difference between "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" than the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB". The "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Axon mini 32GB

vivo V5s (2017) 64GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet79/10081/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games54/10075/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB"

Battery performance of ZTE Axon mini 32GB

The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh.

Battery performance of vivo V5s (2017) 64GB

The "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" over the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB". Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Axon mini 32GB

vivo V5s (2017) 64GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet83/10090/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos67/10079/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB"

The storage capacity of the ZTE Axon mini 32GB

The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the vivo V5s (2017) 64GB

The "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 32GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB". Both the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Axon mini 32GB

vivo V5s (2017) 64GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10084/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10091/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" or "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB"?

"ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.2inch makes the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" a lot easier to use. "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

ZTE Axon mini 32GB

vivo V5s (2017) 64GB

Handling66/10058/100
Display74/10061/100
CPU specs68/10076/100
General rating72/10075/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Axon mini 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the vivo V5s (2017) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "vivo V5s (2017) 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE Axon mini 32GBvivo V5s (2017) 64GB
ZTE Axon mini 32GBvivo V5s (2017) 64GB
ColorGold/Chromium Silver/Rose GoldCrown Gold/Matte Black
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)70.0mm x 143.5mm x 7.9mm75.5mm x 153.8mm x 7.6mm
Weight140.0g154.0g
Display size5.2inch5.5inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 1920720 x 1280
Pixel density423ppi267ppi
Battery capacity2800.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616Mediatek MT6750
CPU specs1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB4.0GB
Storage size32.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP20.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles