Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB or BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-11-18 10:19:02, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:19:28

BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GBGalaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GBGalaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".

BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GBGalaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

General rating:

59.8/100

(The 2151th of all smartphones)

63.2/100

(The 1195th of all smartphones)

Grip
56/100
42/100
Screen quality
65/100
74/100
Performance
85/100
82/100
Storage size
78/100
78/100
Battery
90/100
100/100
Rear-camera resolution
80/100
80/100
Front-camera resolution
100/100
80/100

What is the difference between the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"

The design of BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB

The "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" is 149.0mm long, 72.9mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 187.0g.

The design of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 161.7mm long, 80.9mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 210.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" is more compact than "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 23g. The "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand69/10052/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand28/10012/100
Ease of carrying around62/10054/100

Compare the display of the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"

Display of the BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB

The "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1520, and the pixel density is 285ppi. The "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" has a 5.9inch screen size.

Display of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 367ppi. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB". The "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?75/10076/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?77/10078/100

Compare the camera performances of the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"

Camera performance of BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB

The main camera of the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.

Camera performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 8MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?80/10080/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"

The processing capability of the BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

"BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB". For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" edges out the competition. Both the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Both the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet92/10085/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games76/10079/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"

Battery performance of BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB

The "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" over the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB". Both the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet90/100100/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos78/100100/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"

The storage capacity of the BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB

The "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 128GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos78/10090/100

Which to buy, the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is recommended as it has a 6.0inch screen. There isn't much difference between "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Handling56/10042/100
Display65/10074/100
CPU specs85/10082/100
General rating75/10075/100

Is it recommended to buy the BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GBGalaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
BLU Vivo XI (2018) 32GBGalaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
ColorBlack/SilverWhite/Black/Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)72.9mm x 149.0mm x 7.9mm80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm
Weight187.0g210.0g
Display size5.9inch6.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 15201080 x 1920
Pixel density285ppi367ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh5000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6762 Helio P22Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652
CPU specs2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB4.0GB
Storage size32.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution16.0MP16.0MP
Front-camera resolution16.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles