Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB vs alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-11-18 11:03:28, Updated date: 2020-04-15 21:06:58
How are the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" or "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
The design of Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB
The "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" is 152.2mm long, 73.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 141.0g.
The design of alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB
The "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" is 146.1mm long, 71.9mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 145.7g.
Which is the better design to use?
Both the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB". Both the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 4.6g. There is very little difference in weight between the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.
Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB | alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 68/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 60/100 | 56/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 62/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
Display of the Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB
The "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 282ppi. The "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.
Display of the alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB
The "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 282ppi. The "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" nor the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB | alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 73/100 | 70/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 75/100 | 70/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
Camera performance of Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB
The main camera of the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 13.0MP.
Camera performance of alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB
The main camera of the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 11MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB | alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 50/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
The processing capability of the Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6738 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB", the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB". The "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" than the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB".
Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB | alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 78/100 | 72/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 52/100 | 33/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
Battery performance of Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB
The "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Battery performance of alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB
The "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB". Both the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices. Both the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB | alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 92/100 | 90/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 82/100 | 78/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB
The "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB
The "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" or "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB". Both the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB | alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 78/100 | 76/100 |
Which to buy, the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" or "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" or "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB". If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB". The "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB", the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB | alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 64/100 | 64/100 |
Display | 63/100 | 60/100 |
CPU specs | 65/100 | 49/100 |
General rating | 72/100 | 60/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Lava Z81 (2018) 32GB | alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB | |
Color | Black+Blue/Gold+Black | Metal Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.0mm x 152.2mm x 7.9mm | 71.9mm x 146.1mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 141.0g | 145.7g |
Display size | 5.7inch | 5.2inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1440 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 282ppi | 282ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 2800.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 | Mediatek MT6738 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |