Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB vs Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-11-18 11:43:25, Updated date: 2020-04-15 22:40:53
How are the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"
The design of Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is 148.2mm long, 74.2mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 165.0g.
The design of Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB
The "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" is 141.9mm long, 69.6mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 139.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
"Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" is bigger than "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 26g. The "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 66/100 | 72/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 42/100 | 62/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 61/100 | 65/100 |
Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"
Display of the Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2160, and the pixel density is 403ppi. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has a 5.99inch screen size.
Display of the Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB
The "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.99inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB". The "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 76/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 78/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"
Camera performance of Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB
The main camera of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Camera performance of Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB
The main camera of the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 11MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"
The processing capability of the Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.6GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6750 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB", the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB". Both the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" than the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB". The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 94/100 | 79/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 88/100 | 53/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"
Battery performance of Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2900.0mAh.
Battery performance of Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB
The "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2760.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 140mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB". Both the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices. Both the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 87/100 | 88/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 73/100 | 75/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"
The storage capacity of the Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB
The "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 91/100 | - |
Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" or "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB"?
"Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.99inch makes the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB", the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is overall the clear winner.
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 58/100 | 67/100 |
Display | 77/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 91/100 | 66/100 |
General rating | 79/100 | 67/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB" and "Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Sharp AQUOSD10 (2018) 64GB | Meizu U10 (2016) 32GB | |
Color | Black | Black/White/Shampane Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.2mm x 148.2mm x 8.0mm | 69.6mm x 141.9mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 165.0g | 139.0g |
Display size | 5.99inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2160 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 403ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 2900.0mAh | 2760.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 | Mediatek MT6750 |
CPU specs | 2.6GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |