Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB vs ZTE nubia Z11 64GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-11-18 12:14:44, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:03:57
How are the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" or "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"
The design of Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is 141.8mm long, 72.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 140.0g.
The design of ZTE nubia Z11 64GB
The "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" is 151.8mm long, 72.3mm wide, and 7.5mm thick. It weighs 162.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 10mm in length, 0.2mm in width, and 0.4mm in thickness. Both the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB". Both the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 22g. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | ZTE nubia Z11 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 70/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 61/100 | 44/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 63/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"
Display of the Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2040, and the pixel density is 419ppi. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the ZTE nubia Z11 64GB
The "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | ZTE nubia Z11 64GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"
Camera performance of Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB
The main camera of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of ZTE nubia Z11 64GB
The main camera of the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 4MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | ZTE nubia Z11 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 70/100 | 80/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"
The processing capability of the Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the ZTE nubia Z11 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB", the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The memory of "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" is slightly larger, so "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" is recommended over "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" for multitasking.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB". Both the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" as it has better performance. Both the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | ZTE nubia Z11 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 90/100 | 80/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 85/100 | 75/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"
Battery performance of Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2700.0mAh.
Battery performance of ZTE nubia Z11 64GB
The "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 300mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB". Both the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices. Both the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | ZTE nubia Z11 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 88/100 | 87/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 75/100 | 74/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"
The storage capacity of the Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the ZTE nubia Z11 64GB
The "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" or "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Both the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 768GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" or "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB". Both the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | ZTE nubia Z11 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 84/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 91/100 | 96/100 |
Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" or "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" or "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB". If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB". The "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | ZTE nubia Z11 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 65/100 | 61/100 |
Display | 76/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 88/100 | 77/100 |
General rating | 77/100 | 76/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE nubia Z11 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB" and "ZTE nubia Z11 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Sharp AQUOSC10 (2018) 64GB | ZTE nubia Z11 64GB | |
Color | Black | Silver/Gray/Gold/Rose Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.0mm x 141.8mm x 7.9mm | 72.3mm x 151.8mm x 7.5mm |
Weight | 140.0g | 162.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2040 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 419ppi | 400ppi |
Battery capacity | 2700.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 |
CPU specs | 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 6.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 12.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |