Which one is better, the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB or vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2018-11-18 12:02:25, Updated date: 2021-10-20 18:02:51
Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".
vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |||
General rating: | 33.8/100 (The 3988th of all smartphones) | 63.2/100 (The 1195th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | - /100 | 42/100 | ||
Screen quality | 41/100 | 74/100 | ||
Performance | 28/100 | 82/100 | ||
Storage size | 70/100 | 78/100 | ||
Battery | 77/100 | 100/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 35/100 | 80/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 50/100 | 80/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
The design of vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB
The "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" is 130.7mm long, 66.4mm wide, and 9.2mm thick.
The design of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 161.7mm long, 80.9mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 210.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 31mm in length, 14.5mm in width, and 1.2mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" for portability.
vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 74/100 | 52/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | - | 12/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 67/100 | 54/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
Display of the vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB
The "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 217ppi. The "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" has a 4.5inch screen size.
Display of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 367ppi. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB". The "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 59/100 | 76/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 41/100 | 78/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
Camera performance of vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB
The main camera of the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Camera performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The main camera of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 11MP difference in comparison. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 6MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 35/100 | 80/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 50/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
The processing capability of the vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6580 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
The processing capability of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB", the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 3GB difference in memory capacity. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" than the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB". The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 47/100 | 85/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 12/100 | 79/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
Battery performance of vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB
The "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 1900.0mAh.
Battery performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 3100mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" over the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB". Both the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 77/100 | 100/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 57/100 | 100/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB
The "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Both the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"?
Its perfect screen size of 6.0inch makes the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB", the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | - | 42/100 |
Display | 41/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 28/100 | 82/100 |
General rating | 48/100 | 75/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo Y25 (2017) 16GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
Color | White+Gray | White/Black/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 66.4mm x 130.7mm x 9.2mm | 80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 210.0g | |
Display size | 4.5inch | 6.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 854 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 217ppi | 367ppi |
Battery capacity | 1900.0mAh | 5000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6580 | Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 2.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |