Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB or Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-12-10 17:59:20, Updated date: 2021-10-20 14:39:58

Meizu C9 (2018) 16GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
Meizu C9 (2018) 16GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

How are the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Meizu C9 (2018) 16GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

General rating:

56.6/100

(The 3808th of all smartphones)

56.8/100

(The 422th of all smartphones)

Grip
62/100
62/100
Screen quality
63/100
70/100
Performance
48/100
51/100
Storage size
70/100
84/100
Battery
94/100
81/100
Rear-camera resolution
72/100
72/100
Front-camera resolution
80/100
46/100

What is the difference between the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

The design of Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB

The "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" is 146.2mm long, 71.2mm wide, and 9.7mm thick. It weighs 150.0g.

The design of ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is 139.0mm long, 69.0mm wide, and 9.8mm thick. It weighs 158.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 7.1mm in length, 2.2mm in width, and 0.1mm in thickness. Both the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". Both the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 8g. "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" weighs less than "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" and is easier to handle.

Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Ease of holding it in one hand68/10071/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand53/10047/100
Ease of carrying around62/10064/100

Compare the display of the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

Display of the Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB

The "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" uses a IGZO IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 295ppi. The "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" has a 5.45inch screen size.

Display of the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.45inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB". The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?71/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?72/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

Camera performance of Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB

The main camera of the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

The main camera of the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has 13.1MP. The front camera has 1.25MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 6.75MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10046/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

The processing capability of the Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" uses the Unisoc SC9832E SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" uses the Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T SoC. The CPU performance is 1.7GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

"ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" equally.

For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used.

Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet71/10073/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games32/10035/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

Battery performance of Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB

The "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Battery performance of ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3020.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 20mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" over the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". Both the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet94/10081/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos86/10064/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

The storage capacity of the Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB

The "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 48GB. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" or "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". Both the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10084/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos76/10075/100

Which to buy, the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" or "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" or "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". If you want a larger screen, "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is recommended as it has a 5.0inch screen. There isn't much difference between "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Handling62/10062/100
Display63/10070/100
CPU specs48/10051/100
General rating65/10066/100

Is it recommended to buy the Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Meizu C9 (2018) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Meizu C9 (2018) 16GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
Meizu C9 (2018) 16GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
ColorBlack/Blue/ / /
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)71.2mm x 146.2mm x 9.7mm69.0mm x 139.0mm x 9.8mm
Weight150.0g158.0g
Display size5.45inch5.0inch
Display typeIGZO IPS LCDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 14401080 x 1920
Pixel density295ppi440ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh3020.0mAh
ChipsetUnisoc SC9832ESnapdragon 600 APQ8064T
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.7GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.1MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP1.25MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles