Vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB vs Moto Z 64GB
Created date: 2019-02-06 13:24:38, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:03:57
How are the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |||
General rating: | 63.3/100 (The 5705th of all smartphones) | 67.6/100 (The 116th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 57/100 | 66/100 | ||
Screen quality | 66/100 | 84/100 | ||
Performance | 93/100 | 66/100 | ||
Storage size | 78/100 | 84/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 80/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 80/100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and the "Moto Z 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" or "Moto Z 64GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and the "Moto Z 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
The design of vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB
The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is 155.1mm long, 75.1mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 163.5g.
The design of Moto Z 64GB
The "Moto Z 64GB" is 155.0mm long, 75.3mm wide, and 5.2mm thick. It weighs 134.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
"Moto Z 64GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB". Both the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 29.5g. The "Moto Z 64GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 64/100 | 69/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 43/100 | 66/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 59/100 | 62/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
Display of the vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB
The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1520, and the pixel density is 270ppi. The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" has a 6.22inch screen size.
Display of the Moto Z 64GB
The "Moto Z 64GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2560, and the pixel density is 534ppi. The "Moto Z 64GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.71inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and the "Moto Z 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and the "Moto Z 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Moto Z 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Moto Z 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB". The "Moto Z 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 77/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 81/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
Camera performance of vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB
The main camera of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of Moto Z 64GB
The main camera of the "Moto Z 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and the "Moto Z 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
The processing capability of the vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the Moto Z 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Moto Z 64GB" uses the Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.15GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Moto Z 64GB", the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Moto Z 64GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB". The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" than the "Moto Z 64GB". The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 96/100 | 76/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 90/100 | 59/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
Battery performance of vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB
The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 4030.0mAh.
Battery performance of Moto Z 64GB
The "Moto Z 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2600.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1430mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" over the "Moto Z 64GB". Both the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and the "Moto Z 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 80/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 61/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB
The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Moto Z 64GB
The "Moto Z 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "Moto Z 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Moto Z 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Moto Z 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 96GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is recommended over "Moto Z 64GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos. Both the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and the "Moto Z 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 84/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 82/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" or "Moto Z 64GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" or "Moto Z 64GB"?
"Moto Z 64GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Moto Z 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 57/100 | 66/100 |
Display | 66/100 | 84/100 |
CPU specs | 93/100 | 66/100 |
General rating | 77/100 | 72/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Moto Z 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Moto Z 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Moto Z 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo Y93 (Mediatek) 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |
Color | Starry Black/Nebula Purple | / / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.1mm x 155.1mm x 8.3mm | 75.3mm x 155.0mm x 5.2mm |
Weight | 163.5g | 134.0g |
Display size | 6.22inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1520 | 1440 x 2560 |
Pixel density | 270ppi | 534ppi |
Battery capacity | 4030.0mAh | 2600.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 | Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.15GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |