Compare FLEAZ Que 16GB vs AXON 7 mini 32GB
Created date: 2018-02-24 22:31:05, Updated date: 2020-04-04 19:22:43
Which do we recommend after comparing the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB".
FLEAZ Que 16GB | AXON 7 mini 32GB | |||
General rating: | 51.8/100 (The 553th of all smartphones) | 62.2/100 (The 253th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 70/100 | 63/100 | ||
Screen quality | 41/100 | 74/100 | ||
Performance | 48/100 | 68/100 | ||
Storage size | 70/100 | 78/100 | ||
Battery | 84/100 | 84/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 35/100 | 80/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 65/100 | 80/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and the "AXON 7 mini 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" or "AXON 7 mini 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and the "AXON 7 mini 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB"
The design of FLEAZ Que 16GB
The "FLEAZ Que 16GB" is 132.4mm long, 66.5mm wide, and 10.35mm thick. It weighs 125.0g.
The design of AXON 7 mini 32GB
The "AXON 7 mini 32GB" is 147.5mm long, 71.0mm wide, and 7.8mm thick. It weighs 153.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 15mm in length, 4.5mm in width, and 2.55mm in thickness. Both the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB". Both the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 28g. The "FLEAZ Que 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
FLEAZ Que 16GB | AXON 7 mini 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 73/100 | 71/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 74/100 | 50/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 65/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the display of the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB"
Display of the FLEAZ Que 16GB
The "FLEAZ Que 16GB" uses a IPS liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 217ppi. The "FLEAZ Que 16GB" has a 4.5inch screen size.
Display of the AXON 7 mini 32GB
The "AXON 7 mini 32GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "AXON 7 mini 32GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "AXON 7 mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "AXON 7 mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "AXON 7 mini 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "FLEAZ Que 16GB". The "AXON 7 mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
FLEAZ Que 16GB | AXON 7 mini 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 59/100 | 70/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 41/100 | 70/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB"
Camera performance of FLEAZ Que 16GB
The main camera of the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of AXON 7 mini 32GB
The main camera of the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 11MP difference in comparison. The "AXON 7 mini 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "AXON 7 mini 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "AXON 7 mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "AXON 7 mini 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "AXON 7 mini 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
FLEAZ Que 16GB | AXON 7 mini 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 35/100 | 80/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB"
The processing capability of the FLEAZ Que 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" uses the MT6735A SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the AXON 7 mini 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" uses the Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "FLEAZ Que 16GB", the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "AXON 7 mini 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "FLEAZ Que 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "AXON 7 mini 32GB". The "AXON 7 mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "AXON 7 mini 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" than the "FLEAZ Que 16GB".
FLEAZ Que 16GB | AXON 7 mini 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 71/100 | 79/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 32/100 | 54/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB"
Battery performance of FLEAZ Que 16GB
The "FLEAZ Que 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2200.0mAh.
Battery performance of AXON 7 mini 32GB
The "AXON 7 mini 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2700.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" is a bit better. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and the "AXON 7 mini 32GB". Both the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices.
FLEAZ Que 16GB | AXON 7 mini 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 84/100 | 84/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 69/100 | 69/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB"
The storage capacity of the FLEAZ Que 16GB
The "FLEAZ Que 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the AXON 7 mini 32GB
The "AXON 7 mini 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "AXON 7 mini 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "FLEAZ Que 16GB" or "AXON 7 mini 32GB". Both the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
FLEAZ Que 16GB | AXON 7 mini 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 76/100 | 78/100 |
Which to buy, the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" or "AXON 7 mini 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" or "AXON 7 mini 32GB"?
"FLEAZ Que 16GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.2inch makes the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "AXON 7 mini 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" and the "FLEAZ Que 16GB", the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
FLEAZ Que 16GB | AXON 7 mini 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 70/100 | 63/100 |
Display | 41/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 48/100 | 68/100 |
General rating | 57/100 | 72/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the FLEAZ Que 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the AXON 7 mini 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "AXON 7 mini 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "FLEAZ Que 16GB" and "AXON 7 mini 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
FLEAZ Que 16GB | AXON 7 mini 32GB | |
Color | / | |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 66.5mm x 132.4mm x 10.35mm | 71.0mm x 147.5mm x 7.8mm |
Weight | 125.0g | 153.0g |
Display size | 4.5inch | 5.2inch |
Display type | IPS | AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 854 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 217ppi | 423ppi |
Battery capacity | 2200.0mAh | 2700.0mAh |
Chipset | MT6735A | Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |