A comparive review of the differences between the URBANO V03 au 16GB and Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 2019-07-10 04:58:24, Updated date: 2020-04-15 16:25:59
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and the "URBANO V03 au 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" or "URBANO V03 au 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and the "URBANO V03 au 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB"
The design of Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB
The "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" is 145.7mm long, 70.9mm wide, and 8.2mm thick. It weighs 135.0g.
The design of URBANO V03 au 16GB
The "URBANO V03 au 16GB" is 145.0mm long, 72.0mm wide, and 9.2mm thick. It weighs 137.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 0.6mm in length, 1mm in width, and 1mm in thickness. Both the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB". Both the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 2g. There is very little difference in weight between the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.
Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB | URBANO V03 au 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 70/100 | 68/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 65/100 | 64/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 63/100 | 62/100 |
Compare the display of the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB"
Display of the Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB
The "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1520, and the pixel density is 294ppi. The "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" has a 5.71inch screen size.
Display of the URBANO V03 au 16GB
The "URBANO V03 au 16GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "URBANO V03 au 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.71inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" nor the "URBANO V03 au 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB | URBANO V03 au 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 73/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 75/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB"
Camera performance of Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB
The main camera of the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of URBANO V03 au 16GB
The main camera of the "URBANO V03 au 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and the "URBANO V03 au 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB | URBANO V03 au 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB"
The processing capability of the Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the URBANO V03 au 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "URBANO V03 au 16GB" uses the Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "URBANO V03 au 16GB", the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and the "URBANO V03 au 16GB" are not large at all. For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" edges out the competition. The "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" than the "URBANO V03 au 16GB".
Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB | URBANO V03 au 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 78/100 | 74/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 52/100 | 37/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB"
Battery performance of Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB
The "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Battery performance of URBANO V03 au 16GB
The "URBANO V03 au 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2600.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 400mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" over the "URBANO V03 au 16GB". Both the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and the "URBANO V03 au 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB | URBANO V03 au 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 95/100 | 84/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 87/100 | 69/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB
The "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the URBANO V03 au 16GB
The "URBANO V03 au 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 200.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "URBANO V03 au 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 56GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "URBANO V03 au 16GB" is recommended over "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos. Both the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and the "URBANO V03 au 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB | URBANO V03 au 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 78/100 | 85/100 |
Which to buy, the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" or "URBANO V03 au 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" or "URBANO V03 au 16GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB". If you want a larger screen, "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" is recommended as it has a 5.71inch screen. The "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB" overall, "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB | URBANO V03 au 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 67/100 | 64/100 |
Display | 64/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 65/100 | 54/100 |
General rating | 71/100 | 63/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the URBANO V03 au 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "URBANO V03 au 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "URBANO V03 au 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB" and "URBANO V03 au 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Coolpad Cool 3 Plus 32GB | URBANO V03 au 16GB | |
Color | Ocean Blue/Cherry Black | / / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 70.9mm x 145.7mm x 8.2mm | 72.0mm x 145.0mm x 9.2mm |
Weight | 135.0g | 137.0g |
Display size | 5.71inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1520 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 294ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 2600.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 | Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |