Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Ulefone Armor X2 16GB vs Lava X3 (2016) 8GB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2020-01-08 14:30:51, Updated date: 2022-06-02 14:25:04

Ulefone Armor X2 16GBLava X3 (2016) 8GB
Ulefone Armor X2 16GBLava X3 (2016) 8GB

How are the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Ulefone Armor X2 16GBLava X3 (2016) 8GB
Ulefone Armor X2 16GB

Lava X3 (2016) 8GB

General rating:
Griprating-image1.9
76.6mm x 163.0mm x 13.9mm
rating-image3.2
72.0mm x 144.0mm x 8.5mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.2
IPS LCD, 5.5inch, 720 x 1440
rating-image2.8
IPS LCD, 5.0inch, 720 x 1280
Performancerating-image2.4
Mediatek MT6580, 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores), 2.0GB
rating-image2.4
1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores), 2.0GB
Storage sizerating-image3.5
16.0GB
rating-image1.8
8.0GB
Batteryrating-image5.0
5500.0mAh
rating-image4.1
2500.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image2.5
8.0MP
rating-image2.5
8.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
5.0MP
rating-image3.3
5.0MP

What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and the "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB"

The design of Ulefone Armor X2 16GB

The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" is 163.0mm long, 76.6mm wide, and 13.9mm thick. It weighs 256.0g.

The design of Lava X3 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" is 144.0mm long, 72.0mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 142.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 19mm in length, 4.5mm in width, and 5.4mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" for portability.

The difference in weight is 114g. The "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Ulefone Armor X2 16GB

Lava X3 (2016) 8GB

Ease of holding it in one hand49/10069/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand0/10060/100
Ease of carrying around52/10062/100

Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB"

Display of the Ulefone Armor X2 16GB

The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 292ppi. The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the Lava X3 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" nor the "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Ulefone Armor X2 16GB

Lava X3 (2016) 8GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB"

Camera performance of Ulefone Armor X2 16GB

The main camera of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of Lava X3 (2016) 8GB

The main camera of the "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones.

When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

Ulefone Armor X2 16GB

Lava X3 (2016) 8GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB"

The processing capability of the Ulefone Armor X2 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6580 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the Lava X3 (2016) 8GB

The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and the "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and the "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" equally.

There is basically no difference between "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used.

Ulefone Armor X2 16GB

Lava X3 (2016) 8GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet71/10071/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games32/10032/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB"

Battery performance of Ulefone Armor X2 16GB

The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" has a battery capacity of 5500.0mAh.

Battery performance of Lava X3 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 3000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" over the "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and the "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor X2 16GB

Lava X3 (2016) 8GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10082/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10066/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB"

The storage capacity of the Ulefone Armor X2 16GB

The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Lava X3 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 8GB. The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 104GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor X2 16GB

Lava X3 (2016) 8GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10035/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos76/10056/100

Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" or "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" or "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" is recommended as it has a 5.5inch screen. There isn't much difference between "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" in terms of performance or specifications. When comparing "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" overall, "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Ulefone Armor X2 16GB

Lava X3 (2016) 8GB

Handling37/10064/100
Display63/10056/100
CPU specs48/10048/100
General rating61/10055/100

Is it recommended to buy the Ulefone Armor X2 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" is difficult to hold and use compared to other smartphones. People with large hands can probably manage to operate it with one hand, but a smaller, more compact phone would be preferable for most people. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Lava X3 (2016) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "Lava X3 (2016) 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Ulefone Armor X2 16GBLava X3 (2016) 8GB
Ulefone Armor X2 16GBLava X3 (2016) 8GB
ColorDark Gray/Rose GoldWhite+Silver/Blue+Black/White+Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.6mm x 163.0mm x 13.9mm72.0mm x 144.0mm x 8.5mm
Weight256.0g142.0g
Display size5.5inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1440720 x 1280
Pixel density292ppi293ppi
Battery capacity5500.0mAh2500.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6580
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB8.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles