Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB vs Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2020-02-12 15:14:22, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:57:37
How are the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" or "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"
The design of Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB
The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" is 159.4mm long, 72.4mm wide, and 7.7mm thick. It weighs 171.0g.
The design of Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB
The "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" is 142.4mm long, 71.1mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 138.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 17mm in length, 1.3mm in width, and 0.2mm in thickness. Both the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB". Both the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 33g. The "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB | Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 70/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 38/100 | 63/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 63/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"
Display of the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB
The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2400, and the pixel density is 404ppi. The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" has a 6.5inch screen size.
Display of the Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB
The "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB". The "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB | Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 80/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 84/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"
Camera performance of Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB
The main camera of the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 32.0MP.
Camera performance of Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB
The main camera of the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 40MP difference in comparison. The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 27MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB | Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"
The processing capability of the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G SoC. The CPU performance is 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.
The processing capability of the Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" uses the Spreadtrum SC8830 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 10GB difference in memory capacity. The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB". The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB". The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB | Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 72/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 99/100 | 33/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"
Battery performance of Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB
The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4025.0mAh.
Battery performance of Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB
The "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2600.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1425mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" over the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB". Both the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB | Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 84/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 69/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB
The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB
The "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 240GB. The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB | Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 76/100 |
Which to buy, the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" or "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" or "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB"?
"Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 6.5inch makes the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB", the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" is overall the clear winner.
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB | Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 59/100 | 66/100 |
Display | 81/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 99/100 | 49/100 |
General rating | 86/100 | 60/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G 256GB | Galaxy J2 Pro (2016) 16GB | |
Color | Black/White/Starry Night/Sunrise/Classic Blue | Silver/Black/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.4mm x 159.4mm x 7.7mm | 71.1mm x 142.4mm x 8.0mm |
Weight | 171.0g | 138.0g |
Display size | 6.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2400 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 404ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 4025.0mAh | 2600.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G | Spreadtrum SC8830 |
CPU specs | 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 32.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |