705KC 32GB vs Moto Z 64GB
Created date: 2018-02-24 23:10:14, Updated date: 2020-04-04 22:40:24
Which do we recommend after comparing the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "705KC 32GB" and the "Moto Z 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "705KC 32GB" or "Moto Z 64GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB" ?
What is the difference between the "705KC 32GB" and the "Moto Z 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
The design of 705KC 32GB
The "705KC 32GB" is 147.0mm long, 71.0mm wide, and 9.2mm thick. It weighs 142.0g.
The design of Moto Z 64GB
The "Moto Z 64GB" is 155.0mm long, 75.3mm wide, and 5.2mm thick. It weighs 134.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 8mm in length, 4.2mm in width, and 3mm in thickness. Both the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB". Both the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 8g. "Moto Z 64GB" weighs less than "705KC 32GB" and is easier to handle.
705KC 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 70/100 | 69/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 60/100 | 66/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 63/100 | 62/100 |
Compare the display of the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
Display of the 705KC 32GB
The "705KC 32GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "705KC 32GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the Moto Z 64GB
The "Moto Z 64GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2560, and the pixel density is 534ppi. The "Moto Z 64GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Moto Z 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Moto Z 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Moto Z 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Moto Z 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Moto Z 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "705KC 32GB". The "Moto Z 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "705KC 32GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
705KC 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
Camera performance of 705KC 32GB
The main camera of the "705KC 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of Moto Z 64GB
The main camera of the "Moto Z 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "705KC 32GB" and the "Moto Z 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
705KC 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
The processing capability of the 705KC 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "705KC 32GB" uses the Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the Moto Z 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Moto Z 64GB" uses the Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.15GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
"705KC 32GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Moto Z 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Moto Z 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "705KC 32GB" and the "Moto Z 64GB" are not large at all. For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "705KC 32GB" edges out the competition. The "705KC 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "705KC 32GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Moto Z 64GB" as it has better performance.
705KC 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 78/100 | 76/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 53/100 | 59/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
Battery performance of 705KC 32GB
The "705KC 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2600.0mAh.
Battery performance of Moto Z 64GB
The "Moto Z 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2600.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "705KC 32GB" over the "Moto Z 64GB". Both the "705KC 32GB" and the "Moto Z 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "705KC 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "705KC 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
705KC 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 91/100 | 80/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 80/100 | 61/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB"
The storage capacity of the 705KC 32GB
The "705KC 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Moto Z 64GB
The "Moto Z 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "Moto Z 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Moto Z 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "705KC 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Moto Z 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 96GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "705KC 32GB" is recommended over "Moto Z 64GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos. Both the "705KC 32GB" and the "Moto Z 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
705KC 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 84/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 82/100 |
Which to buy, the "705KC 32GB" or "Moto Z 64GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "705KC 32GB" or "Moto Z 64GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB". Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Moto Z 64GB" a lot easier to use. There isn't much difference between "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
705KC 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 64/100 | 66/100 |
Display | 56/100 | 84/100 |
CPU specs | 66/100 | 66/100 |
General rating | 68/100 | 72/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the 705KC 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "705KC 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "705KC 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Moto Z 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Moto Z 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Moto Z 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "705KC 32GB" and "Moto Z 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
705KC 32GB | Moto Z 64GB | |
Color | / / | / / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 71.0mm x 147.0mm x 9.2mm | 75.3mm x 155.0mm x 5.2mm |
Weight | 142.0g | 134.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | TFT | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1440 x 2560 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 534ppi |
Battery capacity | 2600.0mAh | 2600.0mAh |
Chipset | Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 | Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 |
CPU specs | 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.15GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |